WHO Globalization, TRIPS and access to pharmaceuticals
Publication date: 2001
T he World Trade Organization (WTO) is the inter-national organization dealing with rules of trade between nations. Although the WTO became offi- cially operational only in January 1995, it is the suc- cessor to the GATT multilateral trading system found- ed in 1947. In becoming Members of the WTO, coun- tries undertake to abide by its rules. As of 30 November 2000, the WTO counted 140 Members. The WTO is charged with setting the legal ground rules for international trade. Its objectives are to pro- mote: (1) non-discrimination (2) progressive liberal- ization of barriers to trade (3) predictable policies and transparency (4) competition and (5) special provisions for developing countries. WTO Agreements In joining the WTO, Members adhere to 18 specific agreements annexed to the Agreement establishing the WTO. They cannot choose to be party to some agreements but not others (with the exception of a few “plurilateral” agreements that are not obligato- ry). Of greatest relevance to the health sector are: the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS); the Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS); the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT); the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT); and the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS). Of these agreements, TRIPS is expected to have the greatest impact on the pharmaceutical sector. The TBT Agreement should be of particular concern to producing countries, since its implementation may affect export markets. Implementation and dispute settlement The WTO Agreement is a treaty that creates interna- tional obligations among its Members. These obliga- tions include refraining from taking actions that are inconsistent with the agreement, and implementing certain provisions via national legislation. The various parts of the WTO Agreement, including the TRIPS Agreement, require that such national leg- islation embodies certain specific standards. However, in many areas, the WTO Agreement affords considerable discretion in how its obligations are implemented. This discretion, combined with the potential impact of national legislation on health, make it imperative that health officials work closely with other parts of government, such as the trade department, and use top-level legal, trade and pharmaceutical expertise when legislation is being drafted. (See Box 1.) Disputes can arise when countries differ in their inter- pretation of the WTO Agreement. The WTO provides a dispute settlement process that may proceed from a consultation phase, to the establishment of and decision by a dispute settlement panel, and appeal to the Appellate Body. Trade sanctions may only be Globalization, TRIPS and access to pharmaceuticals No. 3 March 2001 World Health Organization Geneva WHO Policy Perspectives on Medicines Box 1 Points for policy-makers ❑ TRIPS establishes intellectual property standards for WTO Members, historically based on the standards of developed countries. ❑ TRIPS requires patent protection for all products and processes, with a minimum duration of 20 years from the original date of filing, without any special consideration for pharmaceuticals. ❑ The TRIPS Agreement permits Members some discretion in enacting and amending their laws and regulations, which can help promote public health goals. ❑ When establishing standards of patentability for pharmaceuticals countries should consider the implications for health of those standards. Standards which are too broad may lead to inappropriate extension of patent life beyond the period required by TRIPS. ❑ WTO free trade provisions can stimulate generic competition and reduce the prices for off-patent drugs, but TRIPS may also significantly delay the introduction of new generic drugs, depending on the way in which national legislation is designed and implemented. ❑ Developing countries should be cautious about enacting legislation more stringent than the TRIPS requirements (“TRIPS-plus”). A new era in global trade Creation of the World Trade Organization imposed if the dispute settlement process has run its course and the losing country has failed to comply with the decision made. Thus, WTO Members may not unilaterally impose trade sanctions based on alleged failures to comply with TRIPS. Key requirements of the TRIPS Agreement The TRIPS Agreement introduced global minimum standards for protecting and enforcing nearly all forms of intellectual property rights, including those for pharmaceuticals. The Agreement’s 73 Articles cover basic principles, standards and use of patents, enforcement, dispute settlement and a range of other subjects. The key requirements for pharmaceu- ticals are described below and summarized in Box 2. Patent protection Members must provide patent protection for a mini- mum of 20 years from the filing date of a patent application, for any invention, including of a phar- maceutical product or process. The invention must fulfil the criteria of novelty, inventive step and useful- ness (subject to certain exceptions – see Box 2). Rights conferred TRIPS specifies the rights conferred on a patent owner, but allows for limited exceptions and com- pulsory licensing, subject to specified conditions. The Agreement also contains provisions on: protection of undisclosed information (including test data); actions to address anti-competitive practices; pro- tection of trademarks (relevant to generic substitu- tion and combating counterfeit drugs); and enforcement. Transitional arrangements TRIPS provides transitional periods during which countries are required to bring their national legisla- tion and practices into conformity with its provisions. The latest dates for WTO Members were/are: 1996 for developed countries; 2000 for developing countries (as a general rule); 2005 for developing countries who had not introduced patents before joining the WTO; and 2006 for least-developed countries. TRIPS specifically recognizes the economic, financial, administrative and technological constraints of the least-developed countries. It therefore provides the possibility for further extension of the transitional period. Public health and TRIPS International conventions before TRIPS did not spec- ify minimum standards for patents. Over 40 countries provided no patent protection for pharmaceuticals, many provided only process and not product patents, and the duration of patents was much less than 20 years in many countries. From the health sector’s perspective, intellectual property standards, including those specified in TRIPS, should take protection of public health into account. However, current standards – historically derived from those of developed countries – are not necessarily appropriate for countries struggling to meet health and development needs. Developing countries can therefore use the flexibility of TRIPS pro- visions and its safeguards to protect public health. Patentability What can be patented? TRIPS specifies patents must be available for all discoveries which "…are new, involve an inventive step and are capable of indus- trial application (Article 27)." The difference between the number of new drugs (“new chemical entities”) that are developed glob- ally each year, and the number of patents awarded for new uses of a drug, processes, dosage forms, for- mulations and different forms of the same molecule, including patents on genes and genomic sequences is enormous. The latter is influenced by national leg- islation and practices. Yet because “new” and “inventive” are not defined, countries must establish their own criteria for these terms. They should recognize that patentability stan- dards which are too broad can contribute to “ever- greening”. This means that the effective patent life for a new medicine is extended beyond the 20-year TRIPS minimum. Therefore, Ministries of Health must work closely with other ministries to formulate and/or revise national patent legislation to ensure that it takes public health needs into account. Generic drugs Promotion of generic drugs requires appropriate legis- lation and regulations, reliable quality assurance capacity, professional and public acceptance of generic drugs, and economic incentives and infor- mation for both prescribers and consumers. The TRIPS Agreement does not prevent Members from requiring generic labelling and allowing generic substitution. Trade liberalization can increase competition and reduce prices for generic drugs that are already on the market. But if the wording and implementation of TRIPS-compliant national legislation and regulations are inappropriate, the introduction of new generic drugs can be delayed. The economic cost to gov- ernments, households and public health can be enormous. Page 2: WHO Policy Perspectives on Medicines – Globalization, TRIPS and access to pharmaceuticals Box 2 Articles of the TRIPS Agreement of greatest relevance to pharmaceuticals “National Treatment.Each Member shall accord to the nationals of other Members treatment no less favourable than that it accords to its own nationals with regard to the protection of intellectual property…” “Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment…With regard to the protection of intellectual property, any advantage, favour, privilege or immunity granted by a Member to the nationals of any other country shall be accorded immediately and unconditionally to the nationals of all other Members…” “Exhaustion…For the purposes of dispute settlement under this Agreement, subject to the provisons of Articles 3 [National Treatment] and 4 [Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment], nothing in this Agreement shall be used to address the issue of the exhaustion of intellectual property rights.” “Objectives…The protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights should contribute to the promotion of technological innovation and to the transfer and dissemination of technology, to the mutual advantage of producers and users of technological knowledge and in a manner conducive to social and economic welfare, and to a balance of rights and obligations.” “Principles…Members may, in formulating or amending their laws and regulations, adopt measures necessary to protect public health and nutrition, and to promote the public interest in sectors of vital importance to their socio-economic and technological development, provided that such measures are consistent with the provisions of this Agreement.” “Patentable Subject Matter…patents shall be available for any inventions, whether products or processes, in all fields of technology, provided that they are new, involve an inventive step and are capable of industrial application…[P]atents shall be available and patent rights enjoyable without discrimination as to the place of invention, the field of technology and whether products are imported or locally produced.” “Patentable Subject Matter…Members may exclude from patentability inventions, the prevention within their territory of the commercial exploitation of which is necessary to protect ordre public or morality, including to protect human, animal or plant life or health…” “Members may also exclude from patentability: (a) diagnostic, therapeutic and surgical methods for the treatment of humans or animals; (b) plants and animals other than micro-organisms, and essentially biological processes for the production of plants or animals other than non-biological and microbiological processes. However, Members shall provide for the protection of plant varieties either by patents or by an effective sui generis system or by any combination thereof. The provisions of this subparagraph shall be reviewed four years after the date of entry into force of the WTO Agreement.” “Exceptions to Rights Conferred…Members may provide limited exceptions to the exclusive rights conferred by a patent, provided that such exceptions do not unreasonably conflict with a normal exploitation of the patent and do not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the patent owner, taking account of the legitimate interests of third parties.” “Other Use Without Authorization of the Right Holder.Where the law of a Member allows for other use of the subject matter of a patent without the authorization of the right holder, including use by the government or third parties authorized by the government, the [twelve] provisions shall be respected.” “Term of Protection…The term of protection available shall not end before the expiration of a period of twenty years counted from the filing date.” “Process Patents…Burden of Proof…For the purposes of civil proceedings in respect of the infringement of the rights of the owner…if the subject matter of a patent is a process for obtaining a product, the judicial authorities shall have the authority to order the defendant to prove that the process to obtain an identical product is different from the patented process.” “Protection of undisclosed information…In the course of ensuring effective protection against unfair competition…Members shall protect undisclosed information…and data submitted to governments or governmental agencies…” Specific transitional arrangements are provided for developing and least-developed countries (see TRIPS text). “Developed country Members shall provide incentives to enterprises and institutions in their territories for the purpose of promoting and encouraging technology transfer to least-developed country Members in order to enable them to create a sound and viable technological base…[and] shall provide, on request and on mutually agreed terms and conditions, technical and financial cooperation in favour of developing and least-developed country Members.” “Where a Member does not make available as of the date of entry into force of the WTO Agreement patent protection for pharmaceutical and agricultural chemical products commensurate with its obligations under Article 27, that Member shall: (a) notwithstanding the provisions of Part VI, provide as from the date of entry into force of the WTO Agreement a means by which applications for patents for such inventions can be filed…” “The Council for TRIPS shall review the implementation of this Agreement after the expiration of the transitional period referred to in paragraph 2 of Article 65.The Council shall, having regard to the experience gained in its implementation, review it two years after that date, and at identical intervals thereafter. The Council may also undertake reviews in the light of any relevant new developments which might warrant modification or amendment of this Agreement.” Nondiscrimination (Articles 3 and 4) Parallel importation ("exhaustion of patent rights") (Article 6) Objectives of TRIPS (Article 7) Protection of public health (Article 8) Process and product patents (Article 27) Subject matter which may be excluded from patentability (Article 27) Exceptions which facilitate prompt marketing of generic drugs ("Bolar" provisions) (Article 30) Compulsory licensing (Article 31) 20-year minimum term of protection (Article 33) Reversal of burden of proof for process patents (Article 34) Data protection and exclusivity (Article 39) Transitional arrangements for developing country WTO Members (Articles 65 and 66) Transfer of technology and technical cooperation (Articles 66 and 67) Mailbox filings (Article 70:8) Review (Article 71:1) Topic (TRIPS Article) Key phrasing from TRIPS agreement (Note that a number of articles contain further specific conditions, exceptions and exemptions which are spelled out in TRIPS or other referenced agreements.) Page 3: WHO Policy Perspectives on Medicines – Globalization, TRIPS and access to pharmaceuticals Page 4: WHO Policy Perspectives on Medicines – Globalization, TRIPS and access to pharmaceuticals Prompt introduction of generic drugs can be facili- tated by: drafting appropriate legislation and reg- ulations on patentability; use of exceptions to exclusive rights which permit early testing and approval of generics (“Bolar” provision) (including allowing access to pre-registration test data); and compulsory licensing. (See further reading list.) Compulsory licensing Compulsory licensing enables a competent gov- ernment authority to license the use of an invention to a third party or government agency without the consent of the patent-holder. The patent-holder, however, retains intellectual property rights and “shall be paid adequate remuneration” according to the circumstances of the case (Article 31). In the pharmaceutical sector compulsory licenses have been used to stimulate price-lowering competition and to ensure availability of needed medicines. Most developed countries and many developing countries now provide for compulsory licensing through national legislation. A comprehensive patent regime should include adequate provision for the granting of compulsory licenses. Grounds for compulsory licensing may include public interest, problems linked with nation- al emergencies such as epidemics, public non- commercial use, or anti-competitive practices (Article 31). Whether or not compulsory licenses are issued, national legislation which provides for com- pulsory licensing allows governments to provide the medicine in the case of abuse of rights by the patent-holder, or commercial non-availability. Any such use should be authorized predominantly for the supply of the domestic market of the Member authorizing such use (Article 31f). Compulsory licenses must be granted on a non- exclusive basis. Since the TRIPS Agreement provides for non-discrimination between locally produced and imported products (Article 27:1), a compulso- ry license may be granted for importation to satisfy local needs (Article 31). Parallel importation Parallel importation is importation, without the con- sent of the patent-holder, of a patented product marketed in another country either by the patent- holder or with the patent-holder’s consent. Parallel importation enables promotion of competition for the patented product by allowing importation of equivalent patented products marketed at lower prices in other countries. If the importing country’s patent regime provides that the patent-holder’s right has been “exhausted” (in TRIPS terminology) when the patented product has been placed on the market in another country by or with the con- sent of the patent-holder, the patent-holder can- not use his/her patent right in the importing country to prevent parallel importation. Article 6 of the TRIPS Agreement explicitly states that practices relating to parallel importation cannot be challenged under the WTO dispute settlement sys- tem, provided that there is no discrimination on the basis of the nationality of the persons involved. It is widely understood to mean that parallel importa- tion is effectively a matter of national discretion. TRIPS-plus provisions "TRIPS-plus" is a non-technical term which refers to efforts to: extend patent life beyond the 20-year TRIPS minimum; limit compulsory licensing in ways not required by TRIPS; and limit exceptions which facilitate prompt introduction of generics. Since the public health impact of TRIPS require- ments have yet to be fully assessed, WHO recom- mends that developing countries be cautious about enacting legislation that is more stringent than the TRIPS requirements. Non-WTO Members As of December 2000, over 50 WHO Member States were either not WTO Members or had observer sta- tus only at the WTO. From a public health perspec- tive, countries which are not bound by TRIPS should Box 3 Checklist for policy-makers Government process and resources: ❑ Identify trade-and-pharmaceuticals focal point within Ministry of Health. ❑ Establish contacts, perhaps a working group, with trade and other key ministries. ❑ Obtain reliable specialized legal advice. ❑ Develop a mechanism to monitor the health impact of new trade agreements. National patent and related legislation should: ❑ Promote standards of patentability that take health into account. ❑ Establish process and product patents for 20 years. ❑ Incorporate exceptions, trademark provisions, data exclusivity and other measures to support generic com- petition. ❑ Permit compulsory licensing, parallel importation and other measures to promote availability and ensure fair competition. ❑ Permit requests for extension of transitional period for TRIPS implementation, if needed and if eligible. ❑ Carefully consider national public health interests before instituting TRIPS-plus provisions (see text). Page 5: WHO Policy Perspectives on Medicines – Globalization, TRIPS and access to pharmaceuticals evaluate TRIPS requirements, and incorporate into national legislation and trade-related practices those elements which clearly benefit national pub- lic health interests. Evaluating impacts of trade agreements Protection of intellectual property rights aims to pro- mote innovation by providing an incentive to invest in research and development. Yet the TRIPS Agreement, which seeks to fulfil this aim, has proven to be one of the most controversial WTO agree- ments. At least four questions are commonly raised from a public health perspective (Box 4). In view of the impact that the TRIPS Agreement could have on pharmaceuticals, WHO (in accord with World Health Assembly Resolution WHA52.19) is using these four questions to monitor and analyse the effects of glob- alization and trade agreements on the pharmaceu- tical sector. Concurrently, having been awarded observer status on an ad hoc basis by the WTO Council for TRIPS, WHO is able to monitor all relevant issues under dis- cussion at WTO that may have implications for the health sector. WHO perspectives on access to drugs Access to essential drugs is a human right Access to essential drugs is part of the human right to health. Access to essential drugs depends on: (1) rational selection and use of medicines (2) sustain- able adequate financing (3) affordable prices and (4) reliable health and supply systems. Since most poor people in developing countries currently pay for health care, including drugs, out of their own pockets, access to medicines is particularly sensitive to cost. Governments, the UN family, the private sec- tor and civil society each have vital roles and respon- sibilities in achieving universal access to essential drugs. (See Box 5.) Patent protection has been an effective incentive for research and development for new drugs Patent protection has been an incentive for research and development for new drugs. But questions remain as to whether the patent system will ensure investment in medicines needed by the poor. Of the 1223 new chemical entities developed between 1975 and 1996, only 11 were for the treat- ment of tropical diseases. The market fails when it comes to ensuring adequate pharmaceutical research and development (R&D) for neglected diseases such as malaria, a range of other tropical diseases and tuberculosis. Strong public sector involvement, including through public-private part- nerships, is necessary to ensure development of new drugs for developing country priority health problems. Affordability of essential drugs is a public health priority Current financial resources are woefully inade- quate for meeting the health care and medicine needs of the world’s poorest populations. Governments, donor agencies and development banks all have a vital role to play in increasing those resources. But affordable prices are also very important. Among the four elements needed to ensure access, the affordability of essential drugs – specif- ically those still on patent – is most likely to be affected by trade agreements. Patent protection awards exclusive rights to an invention and pre- vents generic competition. But poorer populations in developing countries should not be expected to pay the same price as do the wealthy for newer essential drugs. TRIPS-compliant mechanisms can be used to lower drug prices. Other options to improve affordability include exchange of price information; price competition and price negotiation within public procurement and insurance schemes; price controls; reduced duties and taxes; improved distribution efficiency; reduced distribution and dispensing costs and reduced marketing expenses. Essential drugs are not simply another commodity – TRIPS safeguards are crucial WHO supports its Member States in the use of WTO/TRIPS-related safeguards, as appropriate, to enhance affordability and availability of existing medicines, while not discouraging the develop- ment of needed new medicines. These safeguards include setting standards for patentability which reflect public health concerns, legislative provision for compulsory licensing, exceptions to exclusive rights and other measures which promote generic Box 4 Key questions for monitoring the public health impact of TRIPS ❶ Are newer essential drugs more expensive than they would have been if not under patent? ❷ Is the introduction of generic drugs being slowed? ❸ Are more new drugs for neglected diseases being developed? ❹ Are transfer of technology and direct foreign investment in developing countries increasing or decreasing? WHO/EDM/2001.2 Original: English Distr.: General © World Health Organization 2001 This document is not a formal publication of the World Health Organization (WHO), and all rights are reserved by the Organization. The document may, however, be freely reviewed, abstracted, reproduced and translated, in part or in whole, but not for sale nor for use in conjunction with commercial purposes. The views expressed in documents by named authors are solely the responsibility of those authors. competition, and extension of the transitional period. Parallel importation of a patented drug from coun- tries where it is sold more cheaply can also be authorized by governments. Based on available experience, WHO does not rec- ommend applying TRIPS-plus requirements or extending TRIPS requirements to non-WTO Members before the public health impacts of so doing have been fully assessed. Countries must develop informed approaches to health and trade Countries with least capacity for interpreting and acting on international trade agreements have most at risk in terms of access to medicines. WHO will con- tinue to provide independent data and technical assistance to countries to help them develop informed approaches to trade and health at nation- al, sub-regional and regional levels. Countries are advised to carefully monitor the implementation of the TRIPS Agreement in order to formulate compre- hensive proposals for the future review of the TRIPS Agreement as provided for in Article 71:1. A network of legal experts who have specialized knowledge and understanding of international trade agree- ments, pharmaceuticals and public health is also being developed as a resource for developing countries. Further reading Bermudez JAZ et al. The WTO TRIPS Agreement and Patent Protection in Brazil: Recent Changes and Implications for Local Production and Access to Medicines. Rio de Janeiro, World Health Organization/PAHO Collaborating Center for Pharmaceutical Polices, National School of Public Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, 2000. Boulet P & Forte G-B. Mission conjointe MSF OMS ONUSIDA. Cameroun 6-10 février 2000. Revue de la Politique pharmaceutique au Cameroun. Les Brevets de Médicaments dans les Pays d’Afrique francophone. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2000. Correa C. Integrating Public Health Concerns into Patent Legislation in Developing Countries. Geneva, South Centre, 2000. See: http://www.southcentre.org/pub- lications/public health/toc.htm European Commission (PL Kolker). TRIPS Agreement. Patent Protection. Luxembourg, European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade, 2000. International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Associations. The Question of Patents. Geneva, International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Associations, 1998. Pécoul B et al. Access to essential drugs in poor countries. A lost battle? Special com- munication. Journa of the American Medical Association, 1999, 281(4):361- 367. See: http://jama.ama-assn.org/issues/v281n4/rfull/jsc80337.html Rowson M. World Trade Organization: Implications for Health Policy. London, Medact, 2000. See: http://www. medact.org/wto.html South Centre. Intellectual Property Rights and the Use of Compulsory Licenses: Options for Developing Countries. Trade-Related Agenda, Development and Equity (T.R.A.D.E.). Working Paper N° 5. Geneva, South Centre, October 1999. Supakankunti S et al. Study of the Implications of the WTO TRIPS Agreement for the Pharmaceutical Industry in Thailand. Bangkok, WHO Collaborating Centre for Health Economics, Faculty of Economics, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand, 1999. Trouiller P & Olliaro P.Drug development output from 1975 to 1996:What proportion for tropical diseases? International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1999, 2: 61- 63. UNAIDS/World Health Organization. Patent Situation of HIV/AIDS-related Drugs in 80 Countries. Geneva, UNAIDS/World Health Organization, January 2000. See: http://www.unaids.org/acc_ access/access_drugs/index.html Velásquez G, Boulet P. Globalization and Access to Drugs: Perspectives on the WTO/TRIPS Agreement. (Revised). Geneva, World Health Organization, 1999 (document reference WHO/DAP/98.9). See: http://www.who.int/ medicines/ World Health Organization.Health Reform and Drug Financing. Selected Topics. Health Economics and Drugs. DAP Series No. 6 (document reference WHO/DAP/98.9). See: http://www.who.int/medicines/ World Health Organization. Revised Drug Strategy. WHO’s Work in Pharmaceuticals and Essential Drugs. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1998 (document ref- erence EB/RDS/RD/1). World Health Organization. A Briefing on TRIPS. Pharmaceuticals in the Trade-Related Aspects of the Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement of the World Trade Organization (WTO). Manila,World Health Organization, Regional Office for the Western Pacific, August 2000. World Health Organization. The World Health Report 2000. Health Systems: Improving Performance. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2000. See http://www.who.int/whr/ World Health Organization/Directorate General of Drug and Food Control, Indonesia. The TRIPS Agreement and Pharmaceuticals. Report of an ASEAN Workshop on the TRIPS Agreement and its Impact on Pharmaceuticals, Jakarta, 2-4 May 2000. Jakarta, World Health Organization/Directorate General of Drug and Food Control. See: http://www.who.or.id/currentevent/Drugs/Trips%20 Agreement.pdf World Intellectual Property Organization. Agreement Between the World Intellectual Property Organization and the World Trade Organization (1995). Geneva, World Intellectual Property Organization, 1995. See: http://www.wipo. int/treaties/general/wto.pdf World Intellectual Property Organization. Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement) (1994). Geneva, World Intellectual Property Organization, 1997. See: http://www.wto.org/wto/eng- lish/ tratop_e/trips_e/t_agm0_e.htm World Trade Organization. Introduction to the WTO. Trading into the Future. Geneva, World Trade Organization, 1998. See http://www.- wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/tif_e.htm Box 5 WHO perspectives on access to drugs ❶ Access to essential drugs is a human right. ❷ Essential drugs are not simply another commodity – TRIPS safeguards are crucial. ❸ Patent protection has been an effective incentive for research and development for new drugs. ❹ Patents should be managed in an impartial way, protecting the interests of the patent-holder, as well as safeguarding public health principles. ❺ WHO supports measures which improve access to essential drugs, including application of TRIPS safeguards. Essential Drugs and Medicines Policy Health Technology and Pharmaceuticals Cluster WHO Headquarters, Geneva, Switzerland: Dr Jonathan Quick Director, Essential Drugs and Medicines Policy Department. Tel: +41 22 791 4443. Email: email@example.com Dr Hans Hogerzeil Team Coordinator, Policy, Access and Rational Use Tel: +41 22 791 3528 Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Dr Lembit Rägo Team Coordinator, Quality and Safety: Medicines Tel: +41 22 791 4420 Email: email@example.com Dr Germán Velásquez Team Coordinator, Drug Action Programme Tel: +41 22 791 3509 Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Dr Xiaorui Zhang Acting Team Coordinator, Traditional Medicine Tel: +41 22 791 3639 Email: email@example.com Contacts at WHO Headquarters:
Looking for other reproductive health publications?
The Supplies Information Database (SID) is an online reference library with more than 2000 records on the status of reproductive health supplies. The library includes studies, assessments and other publications dating back to 1986, many of which are no longer available even in their country of origin. Explore the database here.