ICEC - Fact sheet on the safety of levonorgestrel-alone emergency contraceptive pills (LNG ECPs) 2010

Publication date: 2010

F a c t sh e e t F a c t sh e e t including Fact sheet on the safety of levonorgestrel-alone emergency contraceptive pills Fact sheet on the safety of levonorgestrel-alone emergency contraceptive pills (LNG ECPs) WHO/RHR/HRP/10.06 Emergency contraception can prevent most pregnancies when taken after intercourse. It provides an important back-up in cases of un- protected intercourse or contraceptive accident (such as forgotten pills or torn condoms), and is especially valuable after rape or coerced sex. This fact sheet refers to levonorgestrel-alone emergency contraception pills (LNG ECPs), which are available in most countries. Are LNG ECPs safe? LNG ECPs are safe for use by all women, in- cluding adolescents. Levonorgestrel, the active ingredient in LNG ECPs, has been widely used in various formulations for over 30 years and has been extensively studied in women of re- productive age. Levonorgestrel is well tolerated, is not a known allergen, leaves the body within a few days, is not addictive and has demonstrated no toxic reactions.1,2,3 LNG ECPs pose no risk of overdose and no major drug interactions or contraindications exist for LNG ECPs.3 While the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a single dose of levonorgestrel (1.5 mg) for emergency use within 120 hours after unpro- tected sex, repeat use does not pose any known health risks.4,5 Even among women who used ECPs more than once in one menstrual cycle, no serious adverse outcomes were reported.6 LNG ECPs have been in use for several decades and current research shows no association with increased risk of cancer.7 While estrogens contained in many contraceptive pills are asso- ciated with some (very low) risk of stroke and venous thromboembolism, especially in women over 35 who smoke, no such risks are associ- ated with levonorgestrel. LNG ECPs contain one active ingredient only, levonorgestrel (a pro- gestogen hormone), which does not pose any of the risks associated with contraceptive pills containing both progestogen and estrogen. The amount of the active hormone in one course of LNG ECPs is less than half of that found in a cycle of most common contra- ceptive pills (although the dose in monthly pills is spread out over a longer period). Do LNG ECPs cause side-effects? LNG ECPs have no serious or lasting side- effects. Some women (fewer than one in five in studies) experience mild and short- term side-effects, the most common being irregular menses. Other reported side- effects include fatigue, abdominal discom- fort, and nausea.8 Do LNG ECPs increase risk of ectopic pregnancy? LNG ECPs do not increase the risk of ec- topic pregnancy, a potentially dangerous condition in which a fertilized egg implants outside of the womb.9,10 A comprehensive search of the published literature evaluating 23 studies of LNG ECP use in 216 pregnan- cies found that fewer than 1% (0.9%) were ectopic, which is less than or comparable to general ectopic pregnancy rates.11 ECPs reduce the risk of pregnancy, and in preg- nancies that do occur after LNG ECP use, the rate of ectopic pregnancy is lower or similar to what is expected. Will use of LNG ECPs affect future fertility? The use of hormonal contraception, includ- ing ECPs, has no effect on future fertil- ity.12,13 LNG ECPs leave the body within a few days and women who have used ECPs can become pregnant from any subsequent acts of sexual intercourse. International Consortium for Emergency Contraception Can LNG ECPs harm a developing fetus? LNG ECPs do not harm a developing fetus if they are mistakenly taken early in preg- nancy. A study that compared pregnancy outcomes in women who used LNG ECPs during their conception cycle with women who had not used LNG ECPs found no differences in rates of miscarriage, birth weight, malformations, or in the sex ratio at birth.14 Can LNG ECPs cause an abortion? LNG ECPs do not interrupt an established pregnancy or harm a developing embryo.15 The evidence available to date shows that LNG ECP use does not prevent a fertilized egg from attaching to the uterine lining. The primary mechanism of action is to stop or disrupt ovulation; LNG ECP use may also prevent the sperm and egg from meeting.16 If offered over the counter, can women understand information on LNG ECPs and use the product correctly? The LNG ECP regimen is simple to follow, and medical supervision is not necessary for correct use.17 It is approved for over-the- counter or non-prescription use in many countries. Research results have demon- strated that both young and adult women find the label and instructions easy to un- derstand.18,19 Teens and young women who received multiple supplies of LNG ECPs at one time did not use the pills repeatedly in place of routine contraceptive methods.20 Do availability and use of LNG ECPs lead to more unprotected sex? Several studies have shown that facilitat- ing access to LNG ECPs does not increase sexual or contraceptive risk-taking behav- iour.20,21 Women who received levonorg- estrel-alone emergency contraception in a non-emergency context (that is, in advance of need) were more likely to use it when needed and to take it within 12 hours after sex, when it is most effective. 20,21,22 The results of a study conducted in the United Kingdom demonstrated no correlation be- tween young people’s knowledge of or ac- cess to LNG ECPs and the likelihood that they would become sexually active.23 Addi- tionally, teens and young women who have used LNG ECPs do not have a higher risk of sexually transmitted infections, compared with those who have never used emergency contraception.24 Conclusion A careful review of the evidence shows that levonorgestrel-alone emergency con- traceptive pills are very safe. They do not cause abortion or harm future fertility. Side-effects are uncommon and generally mild. Department of Reproductive Health and Research Department of Reproductive Health and Research © World Health Organization 2010. All rights reserved. All reasonable precautions have been taken by the World Health Organization to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the pub- lished material is being distributed without war- ranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for damages arising from its use. References 1. Sambol NC, et al. Pharmacokinetics of single dose levonorgestrel in adolescents. Contracep- tion, 2006, 74:104-109. 2. Kook K, Gabelnick H, Duncan G. Pharmacoki- netics of levonorgestrel 0.75 mg tablets. Contra- ception, 2002, 66:73-76. 3. Grimes DA, Raymond EG, Scott Jones B. Emergency contraception over-the-counter: the medical and legal imperatives. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2001, 98:151-155. 4. World Health Organization . Emergency con- traception fact sheet. ( mediacentre/factsheets/fs244/en/index.html, accessed 2 March 2010). 5.International Consortium for Emergency Con- traception (ICEC). Policy Statement. Repeated use of emergency contraception: the facts (July 2003). ( PDFs/policy/RepeatedUse_English.pdf, ac- cessed 2 March 2010). 6. Halpern V, Raymond EG, Lopez LM. Re- peated use of pre- and post-coital hormonal contraception for prevention of pregnancy. Co- chrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2010, (1):CD007595. 7. ACOG Practice Bulletin, Clinical Manage- ment Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists. Emergency Contraception. Obstetrics & Gynecol- ogy, 2005, 106:1443-1452. 8. Task Force on Postovulatory Methods of Fer- tility Regulation. Randomised controlled trial of levonorgestrel versus the Yuzpe regimen of com- bined oral contraceptives for emergency contra- ception. Lancet, 1998, 352:428-433. 9. Trussell J, Hedley A, Raymond E. Ectopic pregnancy following use of progestin-only ECPs (letter). Journal of Family Planning & Reproduc- tive Health Care, 2003, 29:249. 10. Farquhar CM. Ectopic Pregnancy. Lancet, 2005, 366:583-591. 11. Cleland K, et al. EC and ectopic pregnancy: what’s really the risk? International Consortium for Emergency Contraception Conference, 2009 Sept; New York, NY. 12. Norris Turner A, Ellertson C. How safe is emergency contraception? Drug Safety, 2002, 25:695-706. 13. Liskin L, Rutledge AH. After contraception: Dispelling rumors about later childbearing. Pop- ulation Reports, 1984 Sept–Oct; Series J(28). 14. Zhang L, et al. Pregnancy outcome after levonorgestrel-only emergency contraception failure: a prospective cohort study. Human Re- production, 2009, 24:1605-1611. 15. De Santis M, et al. Failure of the emergency contraceptive levonorgestrel and the risk of ad- verse effects in pregnancy and on fetal develop- ment: an observational cohort study. Fertility & Sterility, 2005, 84:296-299. 16. International Consortium for Emergency Contraception (ICEC) and International Federa- tion of Gynecology & Obstetrics (FIGO). How do levonorgestrel-only emergency contraceptive pills (LNG ECPs) prevent pregnancy? Statement on mechanism of action, October 2008 (http://, ac- cessed 2 March 2010). 17. Weiss DC, et al. Should teens be denied equal access to emergency contraception? Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, April 2008 ( files/TeensDenied_2008.pdf, accessed 2 March 2010). 18. Cremer M, et al. Adolescent comprehension of emergency contraception in New York City. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2009, 113:840-844. 19. Raymond EG, et al. Comprehension of a pro- totype emergency contraception package label by female adolescents. Contraception, 2009, 79:199-205. 20. Harper CC, et al. The effect of increased ac- cess to emergency contraception among young adolescents. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2005, 106:481-491. 21. Gold MA, et al. The effects of advance provi- sion of emergency contraception on adolescent women’s sexual and contraceptive behaviors. Journal of Pediatric & Adolescent Gynecology, 2004, 17:87-96. 22. Raine TR, et al. Direct access to emergency contraception through pharmacies and effect on unintended pregnancy and STIs: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 2005, 293:55-62. 23. Graham A, et al. Improving teenagers’ knowledge of emergency contraception: Clus- ter randomized controlled trial of a teacher led intervention. British Medical Journal, 2002, 324:1179. 24. Stewart HE, Gold MA, Parker AM. The impact of using emergency contraception on reproduc- tive health outcomes: a retrospective review in an urban adolescent clinic. Journal of Pediatric & Adolescent Gynecology, 2003, 16:313-318.

View the publication

Looking for other reproductive health publications?

The Supplies Information Database (SID) is an online reference library with more than 2000 records on the status of reproductive health supplies. The library includes studies, assessments and other publications dating back to 1986, many of which are no longer available even in their country of origin. Explore the database here.

You are currently offline. Some pages or content may fail to load.