External evaluation 2003-2007: improving the safety and effectiveness of contraception in China: a case-study in promotion and improvement of family planning
Publication date: 2008
Improving the safety and effectiveness of contraception in China: a case-study in promotion and improvement of family planning UNDP/UNFPA/WHO/WORLD BANK Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP) Reviewer Barbara L.K. Pillsbury International Health & Development Associates, Washington, DC, USA With assistance from William Winfrey Futures Institute, Glastonbury, CT, USA for the economic analysis WHO/RHR/HRP/08.07 UNDP/UNFPA/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP). External evaluation 2003–2007; Improving the safety and effectiveness of contraception in China: a case-study in promotion and improvement of family planning. © World Health Organization 2008 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization can be obtained from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; e-mail: email@example.com). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications – whether for sale or for noncommercial distribution – should be addressed to WHO Press, at the above address (fax: +41 22 791 4806; e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of speciﬁc companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters. All reasonable precautions have been taken by the World Health Organization to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for damages arising from its use. Views expressed in this document are those of the 2003–2007 HRP External Evaluation Team. Printed in Switzerland Contents Executive summary 1 Introduction 4 Rationale of HRP’s work in China 6 Process 8 Outputs 14 Outcomes 15 Cost-effectiveness 19 Future 23 References 26 Annex 1. The case-study in the context of HRP’s broader contribution 29 Annex 2. The data dilemma 34 Annex 3. Most relevant ﬁndings of the Chongqing strategic assessment 36 Annex 4. The systematic reviews and the process of engagement 40 Annex 5. Centre for Contraceptive Adverse Reaction Surveillance 43 Annex 6. Once-a-month pills and the monthly injectable contraceptive 45 Annex 7. Terms of reference and HRP budget 51 Improving the safety and effectiveness of contraception in China 1 Executive summary HRP has a long history of successful collaboration in China. WHO is widely respected in that country, and HRP beneﬁts from its prestige. Since 1979, HRP has helped establish and strengthen a net- work of research institutes and provided support to build the capacity of Chinese sexual and repro- ductive health researchers. Today, HRP facilitates a wide array of research and capacity-building activities that are contributing in strategic ways to improve the quality of care and outcomes in fam- ily planning and sexual and reproductive health in China. This case-study addresses one example of this long, multi-faceted collaboration: HRP’s assistance in improving the safety and effectiveness of China’s locally produced contraceptives. The terms of ref- erence for this case-study called for examination of HRP’s role in the withdrawal of less effective IUDs (stainless-steel and copper rings) and the once-a- month oral contraceptive, in particular. All contraceptives used in China are produced domestically. IUDs are the most widely used, by about 110 million women, constituting about 50% of contraceptive methods. A pivotal study was conducted in 1991−1992 to quantify the numbers of unplanned pregnancies, abortions and cases of reproductive morbidity due to use of the steel-ring IUD. It projected the health cost savings and other beneﬁts that would accrue from shifting IUD use from steel rings to copper-T IUDs (TCu 220C and TCu 380A) and recommended this shift. In 1993, the Chinese Government banned production of the steel-ring device. Factories, however, turned to producing a copper-treated variant, which was also considerably less effective than the recommended copper-Ts. Once-a-month oral contraceptives have been the most popular and most widely used oral contracep- tives in China. Concern about their efﬁcacy and long-term safety were raised during a strategic assessment conducted in Chongqing, which led to systematic reviews, the results of which guided recent decisions about procurement. Methods The case-study was based on extensive document review, a study visit to HRP counterparts in China (interviewed in Chinese and English, 5–13 Decem- ber 2007), in-depth telephone interviews and hundreds of e-mail exchanges with key informants, a follow-up questionnaire, and feedback from mul- tiple reviewers. Findings Effective collaborations Achievements were made possible by collaborative relationships. HRP’s principal partner was China’s National Population and Family Planning Commis- sion, which oversees the national family planning programme. HRP’s principal research partner in this work was the Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research, which HRP has assisted since 1979. Process The HRP formula that brought about the changes described is a combination of evidence-based research methods and processes that involve policy-makers from the start. HRP’s Strategic Approach was a signiﬁcant innovation, involving high-level policy-makers in rural ﬁeld assessments (carried out in the year 2000), which gave them perspectives and feedback from providers and cli- ents. HRP then worked with Chinese counterparts to complete seven systematic reviews that involved policy-makers in a series of experts’ meetings (years 2002−2004) and generated evidence on the safety and effectiveness of commonly used contraceptives, providing the evidence base for policy-making. 2 HRP External evaluation 2003–2007 Outputs The most signiﬁcant outputs were: the research ﬁndings; s� recommendations that four widely used contra-s� ceptives should be removed from the national family planning programme on the basis of con- siderations of safety and effectiveness: these were the copper ring, the once-a-month pill, a ‘visiting’ pill and a daily pill; a new conceptual guiding framework for overall s� quality of care in sexual and reproductive health in China; and better understanding by colleagues in family s� planning and sexual and reproductive health about systematic, evidence-based research and evidence-based contraceptive improvement. Other outputs included generation of new research questions, individual and institutional capacity- building, training and dissemination workshops, and more than a dozen publications in authoritative English and Chinese journals. Cost-effectiveness This work was highly cost-effective in compari- son with research for policy change in other large programmes for family planning and sexual and reproductive health. The ﬁnancial input of HRP for this work has been modest: total expenditure for the strategic assessment and the systematic reviews was approximately US$ 300 000 over ﬁve years (2000−2004). There is no evidence that HRP resources could have been used much more effectively. Outcomes and public goods The outcome of this collaboration was the policy decision, in 2004, by the National Population and Family Planning Commission to withdraw the four problematic contraceptives from the national family planning programme. They were removed from the list of centrally procured contraceptives, and, as of 2005, they were no longer purchased or provided by the National Commission. The research ﬁndings and recommendations also led to decisions in India (and perhaps Thailand) not to import the Chinese once-a-month pill. Publication in the prestigious journal Contraception of ﬁndings on the high estro- gen content and potential safety concerns about this pill reduces the likelihood of formal importation by other countries. Impact The phasing-out of less-effective IUDs and higher- dose hormonal contraceptives might be averting millions of unplanned pregnancies, abortions and adverse reactions. We consider that the decrease in reported abortion rates since 1991 may be attributable to three main factors: phasing-out of steel and copper rings in favour of more effective copper-bearing IUDs; changed Government poli- cies; and improved quality of care in family plan- ning services. We estimate that about one third of the decrease in abortion rates might be due to phasing-out of ring IUDs (about 1.4 million abor- tions averted in 2007). Conclusions Removal of the four contraceptives from the s� procurement list for the national family planning programme was a major policy achievement by China, attributable in signiﬁcant part to col- laboration with HRP and leading to a signiﬁcant reduction in the numbers of unintended preg- nancies and abortions and associated pain and suffering. Improving the safety and effectiveness of contraception in China 3 While UNFPA and other partners provided s� important support for China’s family planning and sexual and reproductive health quality-of- care movement, it is unlikely that the translation of research to policy and the decision taken in 2004 would have occurred when it did with- out the input by HRP. The National Population and Family Planning Commission and Chinese researchers have stated that, without HRP, the decision would have taken much longer and the process would have been less rigorous. The phasing-out of the contraceptives is still under way, as they continue to be manufactured, are available for purchase and are provided through some public channels in China. Family planning manuals contain cautions about using the once- a-month pill, although it is still available, and it is reportedly available in the private sector in neigh- bouring countries. Recommendations Future engagements of HRP should be strategic s� to ensure that its investment has the greatest impact on health. The National Population and Family Planning Commission and researchers have stated that their greatest need from HRP is technical support to ensure that their research and programmes are up to date. HRP should support the unﬁnished research that emerged from the Chongqing strategic assessment and the systematic reviews (e.g. rationalizing the mix of available contraceptive methods and reconsidering the efﬁciency and the need for a quarterly IUD check-up). HRP should help conceptualize the research agenda and provide modest technical assistance. It should consider supporting use of the Strategic Approach by Chinese colleagues in assessing the actions required to improve the quality of care in abor- tion services. WHO in general should use its prestige in s� China to ensure that contraceptives of estab- lished safety and efﬁcacy are used in China or exported, including supporting the full phasing- out of the four contraceptives from health facili- ties throughout the country and the discontinu- ation of production. Given UNFPA’s commitment to the Programme of Action of the International Conference on Population and Development and its position to provide “contraceptives of assured quality”, HRP and WHO should use the WHO/UNFPA Strategic Partnership Programme and other links with UNFPA to support China’s progress towards these goals. 4 HRP External evaluation 2003–2007 Issues of population and sexual and reproductive health in China have a long, important history, not only because of the size of China’s population, now over 1.3 billion, but also because China sees itself as a leader in Asia and in the world. Over the years, it has considered that its programme to limit births makes a major contribution to controlling popula- tion growth globally. At the time of the establishment of the People’s Republic of China in 1949, China had a population of just over 540 million and a total fertility rate of 6.14. Many in the Government (even Mao Zedong) argued that a large population was good. The Health Ministry, directed by pro-natalist military doctors opposed to contraception, issued a ban on importation of foreign contraceptives. China’s ﬁrst census, in 1953, showed that 87% of its popula- tion was rural and that it was growing faster than the agricultural output. By the mid-1950s, many in China’s leadership had shifted from pro-natalist stances to ‘approving’ and then ‘advocating’ birth control as essential for lifting China’s large popula- tion out of poverty. This would include providing low-cost contraceptives and loosening earlier restrictions against abortion and sterilization (Greenhalgh, Winckler, 2005). Local production of contraceptives began in 1955 (UNFPA, 1995). The most important means was an IUD consisting of an inert stainless-steel ring, which became the main form of birth control after sterilization. So predominant was the ‘steel ring’ that even today Chinese generally refer to any IUD as a ‘ring’ (huan ), regardless of its shape; thus, for example, the ‘TCu-220 huan’. Linked to socialist economic planning, China’s birth planning efforts proceeded in relative isolation from international family planning efforts for the next two decades. Collaboration with HRP HRP has a history of almost 30 years of success- ful, well-appreciated collaboration in China. WHO is widely respected in China, and HRP beneﬁts from WHO’s prestige. In early 1979, after some three decades during which Maoist China was largely closed to the Western world, WHO was the ﬁrst United Nations agency to establish an ofﬁce in China, and HRP was the ﬁrst WHO programme to send a mission. HRP was the ﬁrst interna- tional organization to collaborate in China with the Government, to address the country’s needs in population and family planning. UNFPA was also an early partner, launching its ﬁrst country programme in 1980 (Andersen, 2004), and was also a major cosponsor of HRP. Over the years, the two organizations have worked in distinct but complementary ways. In China, HRP’s contribu- tions centred on creating and supporting a network of sexual and reproductive health research institu- tions, building their capacity and linking them with the international community working on population, family planning and sexual and reproductive health (researchers as well as programme and policy- makers). Its emphasis was to support clinical, bio- medical and social science research in accordance with the highest possible scientiﬁc and ethical standards (Annex 1). This allowed Chinese scien- tists and institutions to participate in multinational research, to become familiar with Western contra- ceptive products and concepts and to build capac- ity for programme research on issues of quality, efﬁcacy and safety. A principal HRP partner has been China’s National Population and Family Plan- ning Commission, the Government body in China responsible for population matters, formerly the State Family Planning Commission. (In this report, the name National Population and Family Planning Commission is used, even for events before the name change in 2003.) HRP is widely praised in China for its support. Introduction Improving the safety and effectiveness of contraception in China 5 Table 1. Contraceptive methods used in China in 1992 and 2005 Method Percentage 2005 1992 IUD 50.57 40.12 Female sterilization 33.84 41.66 Male sterilization 6.98 11.81 Condom 6.31 1.80 Hormonal pills and injections 1.54 3.75 Implant 0.35 – Other 0.41 0.81 Contraceptives used and the predominance of the IUD China has approximately 260 million married women of reproductive age and a contraceptive prevalence rate of about 83%. In order to under- stand the importance of HRP’s contribution, it is necessary to understand the predominance of the IUD in China (Table 1). China has always relied heavily on IUDs, which now constitute approxi- mately 50% of the methods used and account for perhaps 90% of reversible contraception (80% in 1994) (Li Yong Ping et al., 1994). The National Population and Family Planning Commission cal- culates that about 110 million Chinese women use an IUD (about 75% of the worldwide total of 160 million women using IUDs). Current trends show a substantial increase in IUD use, primarily as a pre- ferred alternative to sterilization. Under the mod- ernizing regime that assumed leadership in 1978 and the one- (to two-) child policy in 1979–1980, the prevailing norm was that a couple with two children should undergo sterilization, while the woman in a couple with one child would have an IUD. This policy has now ofﬁcially been replaced by informed choice (State Council Regulations on Family Planning Technical Service Management, 2001, cited in National Population and Family Plan- ning Commission, 2005). A wide variety of IUDs are used, including locally manufactured versions of international products as well as IUDs developed and manufactured only in China (see photo). In the national family planning programme during 2005, 9.82 million IUDs were inserted, 2.36 mil- lion IUDs were removed, 2.16 million women and 290 000 men were sterilized, and 130 000 women received implants (data provided by National Popu- lation and Family Planning Commission, Depart- ment of Science and Technology, by email, 20 December 2007). These ﬁgures do not include pro- cedures performed in facilities under the Ministry of Health, which would increase the total further, to perhaps 20 million IUD insertions annually (Annex 2 and below). 6 HRP External evaluation 2003–2007 As the safety and effectiveness of contracep- tive products has been a priority for HRP globally, the Programme was ready to work with China in assessing contraceptive methods. The inert stainless-steel ring IUD, then the main form of con- traception used in China after sterilization, was of particular interest, as it was reportedly associated with millions of unplanned pregnancies and related abortions (UNFPA, 1992; Li Yong Ping et al., 1994). While the steel ring had the beneﬁt of low cost to the Government, it was relatively soft, thus easily changing shape in the uterus, and was frequently expelled, partially or wholly. Partial expulsion of the steel rings resulted in unintended pregnancies while the ring was still present. For this reason, early on in China’s population/family planning programme a policy of routine (usually quarterly) ultrasound check-ups was initiated to determine whether women’s IUDs were still present and prop- erly positioned. Especially during the 1980s and into the 1990s, women with unplanned pregnancies were likely to have an abortion if the couple did not meet the local criteria for additional births (Kauf- man, 1993). It has been estimated that one quarter to one third of Chinese women have experienced contraceptive failure and that almost three quarters of abortions were related to contraceptive failure, primarily of the steel ring (Kaufman 1993; Cheng Yimin et al., 1997; Luo Lin et al. 1999a,b; Jiang Zhenghua, 2000; Xie Zhenming, Gu Baochang, Hardee, 2000; Wang Duolao, 2002; Greenhalgh, Winckler 2005). Research in 1991 (to which HRP contributed sub- stantially) showed that the failure rate of the steel ring was six times higher than that of the copper-T (TCu 220) in the ﬁrst year of use (Li Yong Ping et al., 1994). Abortions were generally performed without anaesthesia, causing substantial pain to many women (Gui Shi-xun, 1999; Jiang Zhenghua, 2000). Further, many women underwent repeated abortions and accumulated risks of complications, especially in rural areas. In a survey in Shanghai in the early 1990s, young women could expect to have an average of 2.3 abortions and some as many as ﬁve (Gui Shi-xun, 1999). Greenhalgh and Winckler (2005) present Chinese abortion data showing that there had been 3.9 million abortions in 1971, rising to a peak of 14 million in 1991, and decreasing to 6.3 million in 2001. Some Chinese scientists and sexual and repro- ductive health policy-makers, as well as HRP, recognized that the steel ring was associated with multiple negative physical and psychological con- sequences for millions of women, including ectopic pregnancies and consequences of abortions after steel-ring failure (e.g. Li Jingzhi, Zhang Zhicheng, 1990). When HRP began working in China, improv- ing the safety and effectiveness of contracep- tives used, and providing a better IUD to replace the steel ring, became a high priority. HRP’s and UNFPA’s comparative advantage in the 1980s lay in the fact that they were esteemed international authorities and the only international organiza- tions collaborating with China in the ﬁeld of human reproduction. UNFPA relied on HRP, however, for technical guidance. The Program for Appropriate Technology in Health (USA) was also present early on, but under UNFPA as UNFPA’s executing agency for UNFPA-supported local contraceptive produc- tion projects in China. Other important partners contributed later (see below). How does this topic fulﬁl criteria for public good? Assessing the safety and effectiveness of contra- ceptives and removing those deemed less safe and effective from central provision to the national fam- ily planning programme constitutes an important national public good for the women of China and Rationale of HRP’s work in China Improving the safety and effectiveness of contraception in China 7 savings for the family planning programme. The populations of China (1.3 billion) and its neighbours constitute more than 40% of the world’s popula- tion. Over the years, China has considered that its programme to limit births makes a major contribu- tion to controlling population growth globally. China is inﬂuential in Asia and increasingly important in the world. The public goods generated nationally in China and regionally have real global importance. Chinese contraceptives ﬂow to South-east Asia, and there have been discussions about export- ing Chinese contraceptives to other countries and regions. Removal of less safe and effective contra- ceptives from China’s family planning programme contributes to reducing and preventing their use in other countries. 8 HRP External evaluation 2003–2007 Replacing the steel ring by a better IUD The TCu 220 IUD, which was used with favourable results for safety and effectiveness internationally, was proposed as a better alternative to the steel- ring IUD. HRP’s support for improving research capacity played an important role in subsequent developments. Over the years, HRP has sponsored numerous courses on biostatistics in China and supported the training of many Chinese statisti- cians. The courses included one on statistical methods for medical research, organized in 1985 by HRP and held at the Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research, where HRP began building capacity in 1979 and which has become a major partner. The training included methods for multicentre randomized controlled clinical tri- als. Subsequently, HRP sent a researcher from the Institute to England for one year of training in modern computing methods for clinical trials. She then began contributing to contraceptive research and became an HRP collaborator. In 1986, the Shanghai Institute began a multihospital clinical trial to compare the steel ring with the TCu 220C, in a ‘national key project’ funded by the Chinese Government as part of its sixth ﬁve-year plan. HRP provided technical advice on the study design and coordination, although it was not formally involved. In 1989, the Institute published a report on the out- comes at three years (Chen Junkang et al., 1989). The results suggested that the steel ring should be replaced by a more reliable method, the copper-T, which led to the large international study described below. To enable the shift to copper-Ts, UNFPA ﬁnanced establishment of two plants for the manufacture of TCu 220C, one in northern China (in Tianjin in 1984) and one in the south (in Wuxi in 1990), with the State Pharmaceutical Administration of Process China as the implementing agency, the Program for Appropriate Technology in Health as the executing agency and the National Population and Planning Commission as the main buyer. Together, the two facilities supplied 5.8 million TCu 220 IUDs to the national family planning programme in 1992 and 4.5 million in 1993. Subsequently, UNFPA funded establishment of two TCu-380A production facili- ties, in Siping in 1993 and in Shanghai in 1995. The demand for and use of copper-T did not meet pro- duction capacity owing to their novelty, price and lack of promotion (UNFPA, 1995). By 1990–1991, China had a prevalence rate of contraceptive use of about 63%, IUDs accounting for 41% of all contraception and the steel ring for about 90% of all IUD use (UNFPA, 1992; Kaufman, 1993). The cost of the steel ring was only 0.28 Chinese yuan (equivalent to about US$ 0.03–0.04), while the China-manufactured TCu 220C cost 1.2 Chinese yuan (US$ 0.22) (Kaufman, 1993). In 1991, the important ‘IUD conversion study’ was carried out, titled Study of Stainless Steel Ring and Copper-T IUD Efﬁcacy, Use, Cost/Beneﬁt and Conversion in China, which urged conversion to the TCu 220C (UNFPA, 1992; Li Yong Ping et al., 1994). The study was led by the Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research, with guidance from HRP staff and the participation of research- ers at the prestigious Peking University and Peking Medical University. Funding was provided by UNFPA, with the National Population and Family Planning Commission as the implementing agency. HRP provided guidance and analysis of the clini- cal data and participated in a series of workshops for the study (Rowe PJ, Review of clinical, demo- graphic and epidemiological data on stainless steel ring and CuT efﬁcacy. Unpublished paper. HRP, 1992). Improving the safety and effectiveness of contraception in China 9 Analyses of clinical, survey, ﬁnancial and economic data showed that a shift from the steel ring to copper IUDs would greatly reduce the numbers of abortions and unwanted pregnancies and signiﬁ- cantly improve women’s health. It was calculated that if, beginning in 1993, all IUDs inserted were copper-T IUDs, this would, over the next 10 years, avert 41 million pregnancies, some 26 million induced abortions, 9 million live births and 790 000 spontaneous abortions and stillbirths, and would greatly reduce pregnancy-related complications (UNFPA, 1992; Li Yong Ping et al., 1994). If conver- sion were to proceed at a ‘moderate’ rate (within 4 years), it was projected that 31.5 million preg- nancies and 20 million induced abortions might be averted over the same 10-year period (Li Yong Ping et al., 1994). In either case, the conversion would be of “overwhelming cost effectiveness”. The report stated that, “In China, IUD failure is very expensive to the government because… the state pays for a much larger portion of the consequences…whether the pregnancy ends in a state-funded induced abortion, or in a child who then receives state-funded day-care, schooling and health care” (UNFPA, 1992). The study concluded: “Economic efﬁciency is not, however, the primary reason why unnecessary IUD failure should be minimized. Accidental pregnancy takes a heavy toll on women’s physical and psychological health. Although some cases of unintended pregnancy are inevitable, they should not be caused by the distribution of substandard contraceptives. For economic, demographic and humanitarian reasons, the supply and distribution of the TCu should be improved in China, and information about their distinct advantages over the stainless steel ring should be publicized to women and family planning workers” (Li Yong Ping et al. 1994). The study had a direct and major effect on policy. Prompted by the ﬁndings, the National Popula- tion and Family Planning Commission decided in September 1992 to stop buying steel rings for the national family planning programme. Accordingly, the Government issued an order that production of the single steel rings must cease as of January 1993 � a very signiﬁcant act. And production did cease. In late 1993, the World Bank formulated a project for a loan of US$ 25 million to the National Population and Family Planning Commission to upgrade IUD production; this was the Bank’s ﬁrst direct involvement in family planning in China (Gu Baochang, unpublished background document: China’s population program and prospects in the 1990s ). The Government’s order, however, only required that factories cease manufacture of the steel rings: it did not require that family planning providers no longer insert the steel ring. Before the ban went into effect, manufacturers stockpiled steel rings so that they could supply them to customers for quite some time after the ban (personal communica- tion, Margaret Britton, 11 February 2008). As many provinces had large amounts in their warehouses, and some reportedly still have stock, insertions of the ‘soft’ steel ring have continued. Thus, steel ring insertions did not cease, because supply and demand existed, and demand reportedly continues. The steel ring was inexpensive and providers were familiar with inserting it; women were also familiar with it, knowing that their mothers, aunts and other women had them. A second development also impeded the envisioned shift to the copper-T. After the 1993 order was issued, some providers are said to have asked that the steel ring still be made available. This led to production and use of a new stainless steel ring produced with better quality of steel, which made it more rigid and thus less susceptible to expulsion. This was known as the ‘steel ring 165’ because it 10 HRP External evaluation 2003–2007 required 165 g of force to crimp it. Although data are not available, it has been reported that the steel ring 165, which is less easily expelled, resulted in somewhat fewer unintended pregnancies and thus fewer abortions than the earlier ‘soft ring’, although pregnancy rates with both types of ring remained unacceptably high (interview with Fang Kejuan and Zhou Weijin, 12 December 2007; Zhuang Liu-qi et al., 1988). Introduction of the copper ring The copper ring is simply the ‘steel ring 165’ to which copper was added when it became known that copper improves the effectiveness of IUDs. This resulted in the ‘copper ring 165’ or simply ‘the copper ring’; it was also called ‘active 165’. This was the same ﬂat ring, about the size of a grape in diameter, although the steel and copper rings come in different sizes. The addition of copper did not signiﬁcantly improve the clinical performance as frequent expulsions, as well as pregnancies with the ring still in the uterus, were reported. Copper was apparently electrolyzed onto the surface of the steel ring and thus it was subject to erosion (personal communication, Olav Meirik). Soon thereafter, a drug, indomethacin, was added to the copper ring to reduce bleeding after insertion. If there was any effect, it would have lasted about three months. This IUD was called the ‘medicated copper ring 165’ or the ‘high strut strength IUD’ (National Population and Family Planning Commis- sion. 2003-2006 Niandi Jihua Shengyu Biyun Yaoju Taotai Mulu [List of withdrawn family planning contraceptive products, 2003–2006], unpublished document, 2006). A complete shift to copper-Ts did not occur; rather, there was an unanticipated shift from steel rings to copper rings (which had not existed in signiﬁcant numbers before the 1992 directive to stop steel ring production). As steel rings were no longer manufactured as of January 1993, the copper ring displaced the steel ring in manufacture and eventu- ally for new insertions, although a few stockpiled steel rings may still exist and be inserted in remote areas. While the numbers or proportions of steel rings, copper rings and copper-Ts being inserted are not known, the shift to copper-Ts was deﬁnitely slower than projected. Although the two TCu 220 factories established by UNFPA were reported to have supplied 5.8 and 4.5 million TCu 220 IUDs to the national family planning programme in 1992 and 1993, respectively, this cannot be equated with use. The Siping facility set up in 1993 produced 0.8 million TCu-380As but was to decrease production to half that (0.4 million) in 1994 because of limited demand, which was attributed to the novelty of the IUDs, their price and lack of promotion (UNFPA, 1995). (See Annex 2.) Additional information of steel ring and copper ring usage is given below in the section entitled Outcome. HRP support for quality of care In the 1990s, economic reform and development of the market economy affected nearly all aspects of Chinese society, including family planning and contraception. This society-wide transformation set the stage for the programmes of action of the United Nations International Conference on Popula- tion and Development in Cairo (ICPD) in 1994 and the Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing in 1995 to inﬂuence China’s National Population and Family Planning Commission. These two global meetings introduced major new ideas and trends to them. Through the ICPD process, policy-makers in the Commission and their research colleagues advanced their understanding of sexual and repro- ductive health and reproductive rights. Through the Beijing women’s meeting, they embraced the con- cepts of women’s rights and gender equality (Xie Zhenming et al., 2007). Improving the safety and effectiveness of contraception in China 11 China’s earlier efforts to address its large popula- tion and rapid population growth were charac- terized by ‘administrative’ quotas and targets. The paradigm of the International Conference on Population and Development meant a shift from the administrative approach to an emphasis on qual- ity of care and service for clients. Since 1994, the National Population and Family Planning Commis- sion has been committed to improving the quality of care and has welcomed collaboration towards this goal from international organizations with expertise in quality improvement (e.g. Kaufman et al., 2008). HRP has been an important partner in the quality- of-care movement especially by evaluating contraceptives and assessing service delivery, in particular in collaboration with the National Population and Family Planning Commission’s Department of Science and Technology. HRP’s spe- cial contribution has been the introduction of new research methods, and technical guidance for their application, for critically examining the contracep- tive technologies produced and commonly used in China and for evaluating the quality of care. This has complemented the important contributions of other international organizations, especially UNFPA, the Ford Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation and the New York-based Population Council. These partners have established pilot programmes for integration of quality-of-care concepts into the national family planning programme, transforming how sexual and reproductive health services are provided throughout China. While all partners have had important roles, none of the other international (or national) partners is as well positioned to pro- vide the research training and support that is HRP’s special strength and contribution. (See also Contri- butions of other stakeholders, below.) HRP’s Strategic Approach and the Chongqing assessment HRP’s Strategic Approach to Strengthening Repro- ductive Health Policies and Programmes was designed in the 1990s by HRP’s Task Force on Introduction of Contraceptive Technologies. Its objective is to ensure that quality of care and rights are taken into account during the introduction of new contraceptives, rather than considering this an exclusively technological issue (Simmons et al., 1997; WHO, 2000a,b; Fajans et al., 2006). The approach was introduced in China in 1998 for evaluating the introduction by the National Popula- tion and Family Planning Commission of quality of care into six pilot counties (Ma Li et al., 1998). Subsequently, the Commission’s Department of Science and Technology requested HRP’s support to conduct a strategic assessment of the introduc- tion of contraceptives, with an emphasis on IUDs. The Strategic Approach came to China mainly because the Executive Director of the Science and Technology Department participated in HRP’s Sci- entiﬁc and Technical Advisory Group and came to the view that this method could improve the quality of care in China. In 1997, HRP was requested to support a project on quality of care and conducted an important workshop on the Strategic Approach for 25 Chinese family planning ofﬁcials. Participation in HRP’s application of the Strategic Approach in October 2000 was an attitude- changing new experience for the invited senior policy-makers and researchers who have led China’s population and family planning programme. The HRP-guided assessment took them to distant rural and urban ﬁeld sites in Chongqing municipal- ity, Sichuan Province, where for two weeks they had the novel and compelling experience of visiting service delivery sites and interviewing women and families in their homes, as well as family plan- 12 HRP External evaluation 2003–2007 ning providers and community leaders, about their experiences with the family planning programme and contraceptives. This allowed them to see fam- ily planning services differently and familiarized them in very concrete ways with the concepts of quality of care (WHO, 2002c). Chongqing munici- pality was chosen because, with a population of 30 million, it afforded a valuable mix of both urban and rural sites. Those who participated found the approach innovative, effective and different from other experiences. It helped high-level policy-mak- ers to hear the views of people who were directly affected by their decisions and policies. They val- ued its interdisciplinary and participatory interac- tion and welcomed the sessions at the end of each day when the participants would sit together and review what they had learnt from the day’s inter- views and observations. The assessment identiﬁed numerous issues and produced a candid, detailed analysis of challenges (WHO, 2002c). It was found that a broad range of contraceptives was available at most higher levels of service delivery (county and municipal), but that, in some townships, services were limited to IUDs and quarterly IUD checks. The main conclusion was that there were many opportunities to improve quality of care, by scaling up the provision of currently available con- traceptive methods and services, removing some contraceptives and introducing new contraceptive methods and other sexual and reproductive health services (Annex 3). The assessment team recommended that a scien- tiﬁc panel of national and international experts be convened to review the scientiﬁc evidence on the safety, effectiveness, side-effects and cost–effec- tiveness of the IUDs and hormonal contraceptive products currently available. The panel should rec- ommend that a small number of the safest, most effective IUDs be made available throughout China. It should also determine which hormonal methods should continue to be provided, the objective being to issue fewer, safe, effective oral contraceptives. The recommendation to consider stopping the provision of some contraceptives and not add new methods or brands was contrary to what had been expected and demonstrates the value of using a systematic approach to assessing services before changing them (Fajans et al., draft working paper, Contraception in China: using evidence to inﬂuence policies and programmes. HRP, 2007). The lesson continues to inﬂuence the National Population and Family Planning Commission’s management of its family planning programme. Two workshops were convened in early 2001, one in Chongqing in March, followed by a national workshop in Shanghai in May, which identiﬁed the next steps for improving informed choice and ensuring quality of care in family planning and other sexual and reproductive health services. It was decided to conduct systematic reviews of the safety and efﬁcacy of the most commonly used contraceptives in order to generate evidence-based information for decision-making. Systematic reviews of contraceptive safety and efﬁcacy Following the Chongqing assessment, the next step was to conduct a formal, systematic analysis of the safety and effectiveness of the contraceptives. HRP recommended and introduced use of the system- atic review method of the Cochrane Collaboration (Annex 4; reviewed by Sweet, Moynihan, 2007). The method is a powerful one. If the reviews had been carried out strictly according to that method, however, the ﬁndings might not have captured policy-makers’ attention. The key to success was engagement of stakeholders in the review process, just as a broad range of stakeholders had been engaged in the Chongqing assessment. The goal was to provide a basis for rational, evidence-based selection and management of the contraceptives that the National Population and Family Planning Commission provides through its family plan- Improving the safety and effectiveness of contraception in China 13 ning programme. According to some participants, this was the ﬁrst application of the principles of evidence-based medicine to the ﬁeld of contracep- tion in China. HRP and the Commission’s Department of Science and Technology laid out a workplan in 2001, antici- pating broad participation (although, in the end, the Ministry of Health did not participate). In accor- dance with the recommendations of the Chongqing strategic assessment, the Commission convened a group of national and international experts to con- duct formal systematic reviews by the Cochrane method. The Shanghai Institute of Planned Parent- hood Research coordinated the reviews in col- laboration with HRP advisers. The reviews began in early 2002 and continued through 2003 by means of a consensus-seeking process that included both the experts and high-level decision-makers. This secured stakeholders’ involvement from the outset and engaged them throughout the two-year pro- cess. Had HRP only funded research with presenta- tion of the ﬁndings at the end, there would not have been the buy-in from the high-level ofﬁcials who accepted the reviews’ recommendations. Seven reviews were conducted. Three dealt with IUDs: the copper ring 165 IUD, other copper IUDs developed in China and copper IUDs developed in the West and used in China; and four reviews dealt with hormonal contraceptives: daily combined oral contraceptive pills, once-a-month oral con- traceptive pills, progestogen-only visiting pills and emergency contraceptive pills. The main outcome variables for each contraceptive were its effective- ness, safety and continuation rate, as a proxy for acceptability. The review covered published and unpublished papers in Chinese and English describ- ing randomized controlled clinical trials, controlled clinical trials, other observational studies with or without a control group, and studies of pharma- cokinetics when relevant. The Shanghai Institute team searched for research papers electronically in Chinese and international databases and manually for papers not available electronically. At a two-day national consensus workshop in April 2004, the experts agreed on the signiﬁcance of the reviews and recommendations to be forwarded formally to the National Population and Family Planning Commission. The reviews showed that many of the contraceptives had not been evaluated since they were ﬁrst marketed. The experts judged the reviews to be of great importance and practical signiﬁcance for improving clinical family planning research in China, enhancing management and use of fertility regulating methods and advancing the quality of care, as well as disseminating the method of systematic reviews. The conclusions and recommendations of the workshop concerning all the contraceptives studied were forwarded to the National Population and Family Planning Commission. The consensus rec- ommendation was to discontinue use of four less effective and potentially unsafe contraceptives pro- vided by the national family planning programme and many facilities under the Ministry of Health (see Box 1). The Commission accepted the recom- mendation, and, the following year, 2005, did not purchase any of the four (see below, Outcome ). As of 2006, the cost of contraceptives purchased by the Commission was reported to be 420 million yuan (US$ 52.5 million) (http://english.peopledaily. com.cn/200606/22/eng20060622_276433.html). the copper ring IUDs� once-a-month pillss� visiting pill No. 53s� daily pill No. 0s� Box 1. Four contraceptives no longer dis- tributed by the national family planning programme: 14 HRP External evaluation 2003–2007 Many of the outputs of this investment by HRP have already been identiﬁed under Process, above. These include the following, in approximate order of importance: Policy recommendationss� . The conduct and ﬁnd- ings of the Chongqing strategic assessment led to the systematic reviews, which resulted in recommendations for policy change that were accepted. We can say with conﬁdence that these collaborations are having positive impacts on women’s health and lives and that the ben- eﬁts will increase over time (see section entitled Outcomes below). New conceptual guiding frameworks� . HRP’s Strategic Approach gave China a better under- standing of quality of care and contributed to the wider movement for quality of care in China that has been transforming family plan- ning. The ‘triangle graphic’ (Annex 3) introduced by the Strategic Approach has been embraced by Chinese colleagues as an effective formula for improving the quality of care, by addressing clients, quality services and good management within existing social, political and cultural con- texts. In fact, this graphic has become a basis for the overall approach in China to quality of care (Xie Zhenming et al., 2007). Outputs the Strategic Approach, participants acquired not just new methods but also new mental orientations and value sets. They also gained a better under- standing of the importance of contraceptive safety and effectiveness and the importance for women of having high-quality contraceptives. Individual and institutional capacity-buildings� . Sub- stantial capacity-building took place through the processes of using the two new methodologies. A related achievement that also involved institutional capacity-building was establishment of the Centre for Contraceptive Adverse Reaction Surveillance, in Nanjing, supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (USA) with limited HRP input. This Centre was not in the terms of refer- ence for this case-study, but the National Popula- tion and Family Planning Commission urged that it be included (Annex 5). Chinese colleagues have a deep appreciation for HRP as a standard setter, they value the guidance and technical support of HRP, and they value the fact that HRP keeps them informed of the latest relevant developments inter- nationally. They are very grateful, for example, for HRP’s Sexually transmitted and other reproductive tract infections: a guide to essential practice (WHO, 2005) and of the fact that it is being translated into Chinese. In addition to these broad achievements, the process had several concrete educational and scientiﬁc out- puts: more than a dozen local and national training and s� other workshops, including training researchers in the Strategic Approach, training in the method for Cochrane systematic reviews and training in sur- veillance of adverse reactions to contraceptives; at least 15 publications, in English and in Chinese, s� on the results of the systematic reviews and the Chongqing assessment; and new research questions and future directions for s� policy evaluation. “The best aspect of the strategic assessment was that it changed our thinking.” Member of the Chongqing team Greater understanding of and appreciation s� for systematic, evidence-based research and evidence-based contraceptive improvement. Beyond acquiring the Cochrane method itself, researchers at the Shanghai Institute for Planned Parenthood Research and national experts acquired heightened appreciation for more rigor- ous, systematic approaches to research. As with Improving the safety and effectiveness of contraception in China 15 Copper ring and selected hormonal contraceptives removed from the procurement list As stated above, in September 2004, the National Population and Family Planning Commission issued the list and catalogue of the contraceptives that it would buy and provide in 2005 for the national family planning programme without cost to clients. Each year, after consultation between its Science and Technology Department and its Contracep- tive Supply Department, the Commission issues a catalogue listing the contraceptives it will purchase for local governments to provide in family planning clinics. Occasionally, one of the two departments may convene a group of experts to discuss and make recommendations. The Contraceptive Sup- ply Department then makes a decision, writes an opinion and sends it to the leadership group in the [Communist] Party Committee of the Commission, which is its highest entity. The Party Committee, which meets often, makes the ﬁnal decision. The contraceptives deleted from the list for pro- curement for 2005 were the copper ring 165 and the medicated copper ring 165, once-a-month pills, visiting pill No. 53 (Anordrin) and combined daily pill No. 0 (35 Pg ethinylestradiol, 0.5 mg megestrol and 0.3 mg noresthisterone). The deci- sion was based on the following judgements, which were outcomes of the HRP-facilitated sys- tematic reviews (Fang Ke-juan et al., 2004; Meirik O, Fajans P, Fang Kejuan, draft working paper, Contraception in China: using evidence to inﬂuence policies and programmes. HRP, 2007). IUDs. “In general, IUDs with t 300 mm2 copper surfaces should be given priority over those with � 300 mm2 surfaces. There is sufﬁcient evidence to conclude that the copper ring (medicated) 165 has signiﬁcantly poorer clinical performance than the other IUDs it was compared to. The National Population and Family Planning Commission Outcomes should be phasing out provision of the copper ring (medicated) 165. It is suggested that a randomized comparative trial of uterine-shaped device with 300 mm2 copper surface and TCu 380A should be conducted.” Furthermore, “The copper ring 165 IUD has a copper surface area of 200 mm2. It was introduced in the early 1990s and is a copper ver- sion of the stainless-steel ring. The copper ring 165 is inexpensive and among the most popular IUDs in China. The data show that the copper ring 165 consistently presents the highest pregnancy rate, highest expulsion rates, and lowest continu- ation rates compared to the modern copper-IUDs (Liu Shan-min et al., 2005). The high pregnancy rate is largely caused by unobserved expulsions of the device. In one comparative trial the rate of expulsion of the copper ring IUD was nearly ﬁve times that of the TCu 220C and the Gamma IUD. The reviewed data indicated that provision of the copper ring 165, rather than more effective IUDs, results in a substantial number of IUD reinsertions, unwanted pregnancies, and abortions entailing substantial costs to individuals and the public family planning programme” (Meirik O, Fajans P, Fang Kejuan, draft working paper, Contraception in China: using evidence to inﬂuence policies and programmes. HRP, 2007). Once-a-month pills. “There is sufﬁcient evidence to state that the estrogen dose in the once-a-month pills is far too high for it to be safe in longer term use. The rate of short-term side-effects of the once-a-month pills is high and the discontinuation rate is high. The National Population and Family Planning Commission should halt supply of once- a-month pills as soon as possible.” The monthly estrogen dose of the once-a-month pill is 4.8 times higher than that of low-dose combined pills containing 30 μg ethinylestradiol. The latter gives a monthly dose of 0.63 mg ethinylestradiol. The monthly levonorgestrel dose of the Quin-LNG pill is 2.3 times that of the low-dose combined pills 16 HRP External evaluation 2003–2007 containing 125 μg levonorgestrel (Fang Ke-Juan et al., 2007). Furthermore, “Once-a-month pills were developed in the late 1960s and are the most com- monly used hormonal contraceptive in rural China. Available data suggest it is less effective than daily pills and combined injectable contraceptives. A substantial proportion of users complain of nausea, vomiting, and leucorrhoea [vaginal discharge], and the incidence of elevated blood pressure appears to be as high as 7%. Continuation rates are generally low. The high estrogen dose gives rise to concerns about safety of the pill, but there is little informa- tion on the long-term safety of this contraceptive.” (Meirik O, Fajans P, Fang Kejuan, draft working paper, Contraception in China: using evidence to inﬂuence policies and programmes. HRP, 2007). (See also Annexes 3 and 6.) Daily pills. “The monophasic daily pill with 30 Pg EE [ethinylestradiol] and 150 Pg levonorgestrel is the pill for which most evidence of safety has been assembled in international literature. There is also a good deal of evidence of safety for the 35 Pg EE and 625 Pg norethisterone pill (pill no.1). The National Population and Family Planning Commis- sion may wish to give priority to provision of the monophasic levonorgestrel daily pill. The National Experts Group suggested that the National Popula- tion and Family Planning Commission should phase out provision of daily pill no.0 (35 Pg EE, 0.5 mg megestrol and 0.3 mg noresthisterone)”. Visiting pills: “Some experts recommended limiting the number of visiting pills provided by the National Family Planning Programme with priority given to pill types containing levonorgestrel that contain a progestogen with reassuring information on safety. [The] majority of experts noted that there is suf- ﬁcient evidence to state that the dose of levonorg- estrel visiting pill is unnecessarily high. The dose corresponds to taking one full dose of levonorg- estrel emergency pills (1.5 mg levonorgestrel) daily for 14 days or more. If there is a real need for this type of contraception, the National Population and Family Planning Commission must ﬁnd a safe and effective alternative to the current visiting pill.” HRP staff recommended eliminating all visiting pills and replacing them with emergency contraception fol- lowed by one month of a daily oral contraceptive pill; however, Chinese colleagues considered that a visiting pill was needed. In order to observe the long-term safety of contra- ceptives, it was suggested that the post- marketing surveillance of contraceptive methods should be strengthened. This is now in progress, having been initiated with support from the Centers for Disease Prevention and Control (USA) with input from HRP (Annex 5) . Adoption by the National Population and Family Planning Commission of nearly all the recom- mendations of the experts meeting in April 2004 was clearly a major policy achievement. Copper rings and the three pills had been on the 2003 procurement list, but were there no longer. Most important was removal of the copper ring. As IUDs are the method used by roughly 50% of all Chinese women, ending central procurement for the family planning programme of copper ring IUDs means that thousands or millions of women are spared pain, distress and even possibly death. Reducing the numbers of unintended pregnancies due to copper ring failure also means saved costs of abor- tions, care for complications of abortion when they occur and IUD reinsertion, the latter being borne by women. Ending central procurement of the once-a-month pill, which was the most popular pill but the one with the most side-effects and a poor safety proﬁle was also very important. Although a relatively small proportion of Chinese women use oral contracep- tives, the proportion still translates into millions. Both the Chongqing assessment and the system- atic reviews strongly recommended reducing the plethora of contraceptives provided and keeping Improving the safety and effectiveness of contraception in China 17 only those known to be safe and effective. From 2003 through 2006, 15 contraceptives were removed from the commodities list and catalogue of the National Population and Family Planning Commission. Among these are six IUDs, one of which is the copper ring 165 (listed in English on the list as ‘high strut strength IUD’). Others are listed in English as Multiload 375, Cu IUD by Organon (although it is domestically produced), ﬁxed IUD, V-shaped IUD, IUD with plastic, and IUD with copper bead. As of December 2007, produc- tion of one or more of those six IUDs has report- edly stopped, although it was not clear which. The important recommendation of the Chongqing assessment that sterile inserters be supplied with all IUDs was accepted and is being promoted by the National Population and Family Planning Com- mission to improve the prevention of infection (Annex 3). Impact and public goods China and neighbouring countries have more than 40% of the world’s population, and positive devel- opments in China have a regional impact. National and regional public goods generated in China inevi- tably become global as well. The public goods at these three levels are listed in Box 2. To what extent can these public goods be attributed to HRP’s work? These public goods can deﬁnitely be attributed to HRP’s technical assistance, including the partner- ships and inputs of others (researchers, experts, National Population and Family Planning Commis- sion and other stakeholders) whom HRP brought together to conduct the research and formulate recommendations. Would this have been achieved without HRP? The answer is, “Probably not until years later”. It was HRP that developed the inno- vative Strategic Approach and application of the Cochrane systematic review method. HRP helped to identify the issues, effectively liaising with Chi- nese policy-makers in family planning and sexual and reproductive health and linking them with HRP in Geneva, introducing effective new methods and providing technical guidance to local researchers. All persons interviewed in China, and many others, say that no other organization could have achieved what HRP did. It was HRP’s long relationship of trust with Chinese researchers and ofﬁcials, plus its pre-eminence in research, that positioned HRP uniquely to achieve these important policy and pro- gramme changes. Contributions of other stakeholders The National Population and Family Planning Com- mission and the Shanghai Institute for Planned Parenthood Research were clearly the primary partners in the successes facilitated by HRP. Other contributors were the policy-makers who participated in the Chongqing strategic assess- ment, the national experts who contributed to the systematic reviews and the Chinese institutions in which they work (Annex 4). Other stakeholders in the broader effort to conceptualize, promote and implement quality of care were major international partners, notably UNFPA, the Ford Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Population Council. While HRP played an instrumental role in promot- ing the safety and effectiveness of contraceptives, the others were partners in the broader quality- of-care movement. They contributed to HRP-led translation of research into policy, informally or by participating in workshops and experts’ meetings but did not provide direct funding for the strategic assessment or the systematic reviews. Over the years, UNFPA was a major source of programme funds for HRP. It is difﬁcult to estimate the ﬁnancial value of the contributions, in time and in kind, of all these stakeholders. Stakeholders in these orga- nizations give high marks to HRP for the body of work described here and the policy and programme changes it produced. 18 HRP External evaluation 2003–2007 Box 2. Public goods at national, regional and global levels National public goods By improving the overall quality of IUDs, the National Population and Family Planning Commission through the national family planning programme provides an estimated 20 million IUD insertions to Chinese women per year. As a result, China is having or expected to have: Fewer unplanned pregnancies due to IUD failure and expulsion, leading to fewer abortions. This implies: reduced morbidity and mortality (as well as pain and suffering) resulting from abortion of unplanned s� pregnancies; reduced costs to women resulting from fees for IUD reinsertion and from abortion and its conse-s� quences, including opportunity costs for time lost and post-abortion care; reduced costs to the national programme resulting from unplanned pregnancies, abortion and IUD s� expulsions resulting in the need for reinsertion of IUDs; and decreased public dissatisfaction resulting from contraceptive failure and termination of pregnancies.s� The National Population and Family Planning Commission has instituted important changes in the pro- curement of hormonal contraceptives. The Commission has initiated a surveillance system for monitoring adverse reactions to contraceptives. Regional public goods Removing the once-a-month pill (and visiting pill) from public sector procurement by the National Popula- tion and Family Planning Commission may reduce or stop the availability of the method in pharmacies in neighbouring countries, especially if production is discontinued. Negative consequences (side-effects, morbidity, unintended births and abortions) are or will be reduced in those countries. Introduction of the high-estrogen content once-a-month pill to India (and perhaps Thailand) was consid- ered but rejected on the basis of the ﬁndings of the systematic reviews. Global public goods HRP, by helping to address public health concerns about IUDs and hormonal contraceptives, is also help- ing China’s family planning programme to become a more positive example for other programmes. As other countries respond to the need for effective long-acting contraceptive methods, the shift in China towards more effective IUDs appears to have been cost–effective and was achieved with a concurrent decline in the number of abortions. HRP has also supported scientiﬁc assessment of selected hormonal contraceptives (once-a-month pills and ‘visiting pills’ for couples who are together infrequently), which, after systematic evaluation, were judged potentially unsafe or ineffective. Disseminating these ﬁndings helps other countries to avoid such problems. Published in Contraception, the research ﬁndings concern- ing the safety risks of the once-a-month pill might be averting its use in other countries. Improving the safety and effectiveness of contraception in China 19 Table 2. HRP expenditures for assessment and reviews Costs US$ Direct costs Chongqing strategic assessment 86 534 Systematic reviews 103 580 Total 190 114 HRP staff costs 106 954 Total 297 095 HRP ﬁnancial input HRP ﬁnancial inputs for this body of work have been modest (Table 2). Total expenditure for the strategic assessment and the systematic reviews was approximately US$ 300 000 over the ﬁve- year period, 2000–2004. (For more details, see Annex 7.) The cost to HRP of the 1991 ‘IUD conver- sion study’ was about US$ 23 000. This assumes that the one month of senior consultant time and two separate visits to China would be costed as in 2005. These direct expenditures were then scaled up by 36% and converted to 1991 costs by con- sumer price index ﬁgures for the USA. HRP’s investment has been cost–effective as judged by the standard of other activities designed to inﬂuence policy in sexual and reproductive health programmes. There is no clear evidence that resources could have been used more effectively, given existing constraints in China (see below). Cost–beneﬁt calculation is not possible, given the lack of data on how use of speciﬁc contraceptives has been reduced by their removal in 2005 from the National Population and Family Planning Com- mission procurement list; however, the expenditure for the effort would seem to be in line with similar efforts around the world. For example, the Health Policy Initiative of the United States Agency for International Development and its predecessor the POLICY Project worked for more than 10 years to improve policy for expanded access to and use of sexual and reproductive health services. The measure of success in the Project was often changes to strategic documents, including procurement lists. Over a six-year period, the POLICY II Project worked in 33 countries and on seven regional efforts (POLICY II, 2006). During that time, it expended approximately US$ 160 mil- lion, which works out on average to US$ 666 667 per country–year of effort (US$ 160 million divided Cost-effectiveness by 40 programmes divided by six years). This is a rough measure as not all country programmes were operating in every year of the Project. The approximately US$ 300 000 invested by HRP over a ﬁve-year period compares very well. The POLICY II Project also carefully tracked its results. In all, it documented 857 results (POLICY II, 2006). By this metric, the Project generated one result for each US$ 186 697 expended (US$ 160 million divided by 857). HRP’s expenditure on the effort required to achieve its results in China are within the bounds of expectation for policy change activities. Beneﬁts due to use of improved IUDs Abortions averted It is too soon to see decreases in abortion rates as a result of the 2005 shift in the national fam- ily planning programme to use of more effective IUDs. Nevertheless, data show that the number of abortions performed in China has declined dramati- cally since 1991–1992 when the ‘IUD conversion study’ set in motion the shift from steel rings to copper-Ts. While other factors are also important, the data strongly suggest that a major determinant of this decline has been increased use of more effective IUDs, the contraceptive method used by about half of Chinese couples. Other important factors include changing Government policies and improved quality of care in service delivery. 20 HRP External evaluation 2003–2007 Globally accepted estimates are that, in China, the abortion rate and the number of abortions decreased by about 20% between 1996 and 2003 (Sedgh et al., 2007). Chinese health statistics show a drop of about 50% between the 1991–1992 peak and 2001 (China Health Yearbook 1984, 1999 and 1999–2002, cited in Greenhalgh, Winckler, 2005). Over the past 15 years, overall use of contraception in China has remained steady, at about 83% (Ross et al., 2005); however, there have been signiﬁcant changes in the methods used, most notably a large increase in IUD use (along with a small increase in condom use). Most of the increases in IUD use result from a shift from sterilization, as fam- ily planning policy introduced informed choice of methods (see Table 1). As stated above, women with unplanned pregnancies are very likely to have abortions; about 70% of abortions in China have been attributed to contraceptive failure (Wang Duo- lao, Altmann, 2002). While accidental pregnancies due to IUD failure have not always resulted in abor- tions in China, over the years most have (Kaufman, 1993). The preceding paragraphs imply a paradox. In general, sterilization is an effective method of contraception. Therefore, with constant overall use of contraception, a shift from sterilization to IUDs would theoretically imply more contracep- tion failure and more abortions. Abortion rates have, however, decreased. A partial explanation for the decreased abortion rates is almost certainly increased use of more effective IUDs during the same period. The pregnancy rates in clinical studies in the 1991 ‘IUD conversion study’ were about 5.8% for steel rings and about 1% for copper-T IUDs (UNFPA, 1992). Under ﬁeld conditions, the researchers esti- mated, the rates of pregnancy would be doubled. The study used these disparities in pregnancy rates as the basis for predicting large decreases in the number of pregnancies if steel rings were replaced by copper-Ts. As described above, large numbers of relatively ineffective copper rings have been inserted rather than the copper-Ts. Now that steel-ring production has stopped and the National Population and Family Planning Com- mission no longer buys copper rings, shifting China’s IUD use from less effective ring IUDs to copper-Ts and other more effective copper-bearing IUDs (including the uterine-shaped IUD and the yuangong IUD) reduces the number of unintended pregnancies. Here we estimate the proportion of the reduction in abortions due to the use of more effective IUDs. Given the lack of detailed service statistics, it is impossible to determine the degree to which conversion from ring IUDs to copper-Ts (and other more effective copper-bearing IUDs) has occurred. Many varieties of IUDs are used, many IUDs are provided outside the family planning pro- gramme, and no centralized information is available on the numbers of the different types of IUDs that are currently being inserted. Nevertheless, the trends indicate a slow transition from the less effective steel and copper rings to the more effective copper-bearing IUDs. The following is a conservative estimate of the degree of conver- sion: In 1992, 90% of IUDs were steel rings (UNFPA, s� 1992). In 2005, 50% of IUDs were effective copper-s� bearing IUDs, and 50% were steel or copper rings. To estimate the impact of improved IUD use, we conservatively assumed that the pregnancy rates with ring IUDs and copper-T IUDs are 5.8% and 1.0%, respectively. The 1991 study used preg- Improving the safety and effectiveness of contraception in China 21 nancy rates of 10.6% for steel rings and 2.0% for TCu 220C. If these numbers are used, the impact of improved IUD use would double. The second col- umn of Table 3 shows an interpolation of the abor- tion rate from 1992 to 2005. Sedgh et al. (2007) presented data for 1996 and 2003, and the rates for the other years are linear interpolations, back- casting or forward-casting on the basis of those two rates. The third column presents the number of abortions that would occur if the estimated abor- tion rate for 1992 (i.e. 32.4 abortions per 1000 women) persisted until 2005. The number of abor- tions would have continued to increase because the number of women aged 15–44 years continues to increase in China. The fourth column is an esti- mate of the actual abortions that occurred, based on the abortion rates in the second column. The ﬁfth column is the difference between the third and fourth columns. It represents the number of abor- tions averted as a result of the decreased abortion rate. The sixth column represents the assumption about the conversion from steel rings to copper-T IUDs, a reduction from 90% to 50%. The seventh column is the implied number of abortions averted by the improved quality of the IUDs, which was calculated as the difference in pregnancy rates for the two types of IUDs (ring IUDs and more effective copper-bearing IUDs), multiplied by the percentage of IUD users who obtain an abortion following an unintended pregnancy (about 60%; UNFPA, 1992), multiplied by the percentage of married women aged 15–44 years using IUDs, multiplied by the percentage of IUD users using the more effective copper-bearing IUDs. Finally, the last column is the percentage of averted abortions accounted for by conversion to a better IUD. On the basis of these assumptions and calculations, one third of the decrease in the number of abortions can be attributed to the phasing-out of steel and copper ring IUDs. Health costs to women Another signiﬁcant cost of IUD failure is the health cost to Chinese women. Over the years, most IUD expulsions without pregnancy have resulted in rein- sertion of another IUD or in an abortion in the case of pregnancy. In rural China, where many women suffer from anaemia, reinsertions and abortions in rural family planning stations pose various risks, including reproductive tract infections (Kaufman, 1993; Zhou Jian et al., 2007) along with mental health burdens. These represent major costs to the women undergoing these procedures and to the health system, costs that are reduced by use of more effective contraception. 22 HRP External evaluation 2003–2007 Table 3. Estimates of annual percentages of abortions averted (in thousands) due to use of improved IUDs in China Year Abortion rate (abor- tions/1000 women) No. of abortions that would have occurred if the 1992 abor- tion rate had persisted No. of abor- tions that actually occurred No. of averted abortions due to all causes % IUDs that were reliable copper-bear- ing (TCu & others) No. of abor- tions averted annually due to phasing out steel and copper ring IUDs % abortions averted an- nually due to phasing out of steel and cop- per ring IUDs 1992 32.4 9575 9575 0 10.0% 0 1993 31.6 9675 9419 256 13.1% 67 26.3% 1994 30.7 9758 9243 516 16.2% 138 26.8% 1995 29.9 9823 9044 779 19.2% 213 27.3% 1996 29.0* 9887 8842 1045 22.3% 291 27.9% 1997 28.1 9922 8610 1311 25.4% 372 28.4% 1998 27.3 9943 8366 1577 28.5% 456 28.9% 1999 26.4 9974 8128 1845 31.5% 542 29.4% 2000 25.6 10022 7903 2119 34.6% 633 29.9% 2001 24.7 10092 7691 2401 37.7% 730 30.4% 2002 23.9 10181 7490 2691 40.8% 832 30.9% 2003 23.0* 10276 7288 2988 43.8% 957 32.0% 2004 22.1 10358 7073 3285 46.9% 1089 33.1% 2005 21.3 10417 6838 3579 50.0% 1227 34.3% 2006 20.4 10450 6583 3867 53.1% 1325 34.3% 2007 19.6 10456 6310 4146 56.2% 1421 34.3% * From Sedgh et al. (2007). Rates for other years interpolated from these two (1996 and 2003). Improving the safety and effectiveness of contraception in China 23 Conclusions Removal of four less effective and potentially 1. unsafe contraceptives from availability for procurement for the national family planning programme was a major policy achievement, attributable in large part to research collaboration with HRP and leading to a signiﬁcant reduction in unintended pregnancies, abortions, pain and suffering. While UNFPA and other partners provided 2. important support for China’s movement for quality of care in family planning and sexual and reproductive health, it is unlikely that the translation of research into policy and decision in 2004 would have occurred when it did without HRP’s input. The National Population and Family Planning Commission and Chinese researchers say that, without HRP, the process would have been much slower and less rigorous. The impact of HRP’s investment would have been greater if the Ministry of Health had been involved; however, it is unlikely that HRP could have affected its decision. The impact might also have been greater with more active engagement of UNFPA, given its commitment to safe and effective contraception. HRP’s introduction of evidence-based 3. research methods may lead to outcomes and impacts even greater than removal of the four contraceptives. Some Chinese leaders in family planning and sexual and reproductive health emphasize that HRP contributions have transformed attitudes and approaches to research, policy and decision-making in much broader ways. This case-study illustrates HRP’s success 4. in helping build an essential health research infrastructure. It demonstrates ways in which investment over the years in essential health research and infrastructure has come to fruition and can yield further beneﬁts. There is still much that can be done to increase 5. the health impact of HRP’s contributions. Progress is being made in reducing insertion of ring IUDs and provision of high-hormone content pills. It will take time and effort, however, to complete the process, given the size of China, programme structures and manufacturing interests: First, unlike the 1993 Government order to s� discontinue manufacture of the steel ring, the decision to remove the copper ring and the three pills from the National Population and Family Planning Commission procurement list in 2004 was only a notice that the central Government would no longer buy and provide these items for local governments and family planning clinics. As the Commission is not a drug regulatory authority, the contracep- tive pills and IUDs not on its list can still be manufactured and supplied to the health- care sector. Second, many family planning clinics still s� have considerable supplies of copper rings, once-a-month pills, Anordrin visiting pills and some steel rings, and are likely to be hesitant to destroy their stocks (Meirik O, Fajans P, Fang Kejuan, draft working paper, Contra- ception in China: using evidence to inﬂuence policies and programmes. HRP, 2007; con- ﬁrmed in interviews, December 2007). Third, the family planning clinics under the s� National Population and Family Planning Commission also receive funding from local governments to buy contraceptives and can make purchases independent of the Com- mission. It is estimated that about 40% of contraceptives are purchased locally in this way. As the once-a-month pill is the least expensive pill (and is preferred for conve- nience over daily pills), it is likely that local purchase will continue. As copper rings are Future 24 HRP External evaluation 2003–2007 the cheapest IUDs, are easy to insert, are familiar to clinic staff and are a long-standing norm among women, it is likely that the cop- per ring is being purchased for some clinics. The prices of the various types of IUDs are shown in Table 4. Planning Commission) was established as a ministry-level Government agency to oversee the national family planning programme. The ‘family planning system’ under the Com- mission and the ‘health system’ under the Ministry of Health operate independently, the Commission leading the national family planning programme. Therefore, services provided through the health system under the Ministry of Health are not ofﬁcially part of the national family planning programme. The Commission and the Ministry each pur- chase contraceptives separately from China’s factories, and each provides them separately to the clinics in its own system. The two systems have separate service statistics, and no single ofﬁce compiles and provides overall data on family planning and sexual and reproductive health for China. For this reason, it is difﬁcult to obtain ﬁrm data on overall contraceptive use (e.g. prevalence and methods used). Because the clinics and hospitals under the Ministry of Health are independent of the Commission, they can purchase and provide contraceptives that the market offers. It has been reported that Ministry clinics and hospitals are increasingly using copper-Ts, and some are discouraging use of the copper rings, although these facili- ties may continue to provide them. It is also reported that once-a-month pills and visiting pills are used less in Ministry of Health clinics than ﬁve years ago (personal communication, Katherine Ba-Thike, email 2 February 2008). The newly-issued national family planning standards for China include the once-a- month pill as well as the visiting pill (No. 53), but each with a caution that the dosage is very high and that signiﬁcant negative side- effects are to be expected. The standards were set by a group of eminent Chinese family planning and sexual and reproductive health researchers and experts, who took as Table 4. Approximate cost of various IUDs in China IUD Cost (approximate) TCu-380a t 8 yuan (US$ 1.10) TCu-220 4 yuan (US$ 0.55) Uterine-shaped IUD t 3 yuan (US$ 0.45) Yuangong IUD t 3 yuan (US$ 0.45) Copper ring 165 t 1 yuan (US$ 0.15) Old inert steel ring 0.6 yuan (US$ 0.08) In an effort to discontinue insertion of the s� ring IUDs, the National Population and Family Planning Commission has provided picto- rial instructions to clinic staff not to insert ring IUDs along with wall charts showing the approved, centrally provided methods: TCu 220C, TCu-380A and other effective copper-bearing IUDs (see photo in Introduc- tion ). Knowledgeable persons consider that this is having an effect, but slowly. Data are not available to document this transition (Annex 2). It has been stated inaccurately that the TCu-380A is being phased out or has been eliminated from China’s national family planning programme; however, it remains on the latest Commission procurement list. While the TCu-380A is not as popular as other IUDs, the principal reason for its rela- tively low usage is believed to be its cost, as it is the most expensive of all IUDs used in China. Fourth, China has two separate systems s� providing contraceptive services. Initially, the Ministry of Health was the sole provider. In 1981, the State Family Planning Commis- sion (now the National Population and Family Improving the safety and effectiveness of contraception in China 25 references HRP’s Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use (WHO, 2004a) and its Selected practice recommendations for con- traceptive use (WHO, 2004b) (personal com- munication, Katherine Ba-Thike, email 2 Feb- ruary 2008). These experts, who work with both the Commission and the Ministry, serve as a bridge between the two entities (Wu Shangchun, interview, 6 December 2007). HRP collaborates intensively with both the Ministry and the Commission, facilitating knowledge transfer between the two. The remaining challenges are to complete s� the phasing-out of the four contraceptives removed from the Commission’s procure- ment list, to end their use in other countries and to discontinue their manufacture. It is probable that production of copper rings will slow and that insertion of both steel and copper rings will end. How long this will take cannot be predicted, given the many factors inﬂuencing purchase and use. Major recommendations The copper ring and hormonal contraceptives.1. WHO, and not HRP alone, should use its prestige in China and its relations with the Ministry of Health to help the Ministry adopt measures to ensure that only contraceptives of established safety and efﬁcacy are used in its clinics and hospitals. This includes supporting the full phasing-out of the four contraceptives and discontinuation of their manufacture and movement to other countries. Greater engagement of UNFPA.2. Given UNFPA’s commitment to provide contraceptives of assured quality, HRP and WHO should use the WHO–UNFPA Strategic Partnership Programme and other links with UNFPA (such as the upcoming fourth WHO/UNFPA high- level consultation scheduled for June 2008) to support progress towards these goals, in China and in countries to which Chinese contraceptives may be exported, whether through formal or informal channels (Annex 6). HRP’s agenda. 3. Future engagements of HRP should be strategic to ensure that its investment has the greatest impact on health. The National Population and Family Planning Commission and researchers state that their greatest need from HRP is technical support to ensure that their research and their programmes are up to date. HRP should support follow-up of the research s� agendas that emerged from the Chongqing strategic assessment and the systematic reviews (e.g. the unlikely beneﬁt of a quar- terly IUD check, ﬁnding a contraceptive to ﬁll the niche of the once-a-month pill); HRP should publish the Chongqing assessment, already prepared, on its website (WHO, 2002c). HRP should help in the conceptu- alization of research agendas and provide modest technical assistance. HRP should continue working with both the s� National Population and Family Planning Commission and the Ministry of Health to facilitate the engagement of both in research, policy and knowledge transfer. As part of HRP being more strategic in its investments in China, it will be important for the different HRP teams engaging in China to resume and strengthen their own knowledge-sharing pro- cesses. HRP should consider supporting use of the Strategic Approach to help Chinese colleagues assess and improve the quality of care in abortion services. This could link with work to draw up guidelines for post-abortion care reportedly commissioned by the Minis- try of Health. 26 HRP External evaluation 2003–2007 Andersen NB (2004.) 25 years of UNFPA assistance to China: the first three country programmes. Bei- jing, New York, United Nations Population Fund. Chen Junkang et al. (1989). A randomized multicentre comparative study of 3 types of IUD (3 years follow-up). Reproduction and Contraception, 1:8–9 [in Chinese]. Cheng Yimin et al. (1997). Contraceptive practices of women requesting termination of pregnancy: a study from China. Contraception, 55:15–17. Fajans P et al. (2006). Helping public sector health systems innovate: the Strategic Approach to strengthening reproductive health policies and programs. American Journal of Public Health, 96:435–440. Fang Ke-juan et al. (2004). Report of systematic review of commonly used oral contraceptives and IUD in China. Shanghai, Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research. References cited in the text. Fang Ke-juan et al. (2007). Once-a-month contracep- tive pills in China: a review of available evidence. Contraception, 75:337–343. Greenhalgh S, Winckler EA (2005). Governing China’s population: from Leninist to neoliberal biopolitics. Stanford, California, Stanford University Press. Gui Shi-xun (1999). Factors affecting induced abor- tion behavior among married women in Shang- hai, China. In: Mundigo AI, Indriso C eds. Abortion in the developing world. London, Zed Books. Jiang Zhenghua ed. (2000). Collection of data from the 1997 national population and reproductive health survey. Beijing, China Population Publish- ing House [in Chinese and English]. Kaufman J (1993). The cost of IUD failure in China. Studies in Family Planning, 24:194–196. Kaufman J et al. (2008). Quality of care in China: from pilot project to national programme. In: Simmons R et al., eds. Scaling up health service delivery: from pilot innovations to policies and programmes. Geneva, World Health Organization and ExpandNet, 53–70. Li Jingzhi, Zhang Zhicheng (1990). Complications of IUD infection and perforation of the uterus. In: International symposium on IUD research. Beijing, Unpublished proceedings. Li Yong Ping et al. (1994). The demographic impact of conversion from steel to copper IUDs in China. International Family Planning Perspectives, 20:124–130. Liu Shan-min et al. (2005). Systematic review of medicated copper ring 165. Chinese Journal of Family Planning, 13:158–161. Luo Lin et al. (1999a). First-semester induced abor- tion: a study of Sichuan Province. In: Mundigo AI, Indriso C eds. Abortion in the developing world. London, Zed Books, 98–116. Luo Lin et al. (1999b). Induced abortion among unmarried women in Sichuan Province, China: a survey. In: Mundigo AI, Indriso C eds. Abortion in the developing world. London, Zed Books, 337–345. Ma Li et al. (1998). General report of the evaluation of the pilot sites of quality of care of the National Family Planning Commission. Beijing, Report submitted to State Family Planning Commission. National Population and Family Planning Commission (2005). Jihua Shengyu Biyun Yaoju: Zhengfu Caigou Mulu 2004 [Family planning contraceptive commodities: Government procurement master list 2004]. Beijing, China Population Publishing House. POLICY II (2006). A decade of making a difference: the POLICY Project (1995–2006). Washington DC, United States Agency for International Develop- ment, 2. Ross J et al. (2005). Profiles for family planning and reproductive health programs. 2nd ed. Washing- ton DC, Futures Group. Sedgh G et al. (2007). Legal abortion worldwide: incidence and recent trends. International Family Planning Perspectives, 33:106–116. Simmons R et al. (1997). The Strategic Approach to contraceptive introduction. Studies in Family Planning, 28:79–94. Sweet M, Moynihan R (2007). Improving population health: the uses of systematic reviews. New York, Milbank Memorial Fund; Atlanta, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. UNFPA (1992). Study of stainless steel ring and copper T IUD: efficacy, use, cost/benefit and conversion in China (UNFPA Project CPR/91/P43), Project report. Beijing, UNFPA. UNFPA (1995). Local production of contraceptives. Evaluation Findings, 5. New York, UNFPA Office of Oversight and Evaluation. Wang Duolao (2002). Contraceptive failure in China. Contraception, 66:173–178. Wang Duolao, Altmann DR (2002). Socio-demo- graphic determinants of intrauterine device use and failure in China. Human Reproduction, 17:1226–1232. WHO, (2000a). Making decisions about contraceptive introduction: a guide for conducting assessments to broaden contraceptive choice and improve quality of care. Geneva, World Health Organiza- tion (WHO/RHR/02.11). References Improving the safety and effectiveness of contraception in China 27 WHO (2000b). The Strategic Approach to improving reproductive health policies and programmes: a summary of experiences, Geneva, World Health Organization. WHO (2002). A strategic assessment of the need for contraceptive introduction in Chongqing Munici- pality, China. Geneva, World Health Organization (WHO/RHR/02.10). WHO (2004a). Medical eligibility criteria for contra- ceptive use. Third edition. Geneva, World Health Organization. WHO (2004b). Selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use. Geneva, World Health Organization. WHO (2005). Sexually transmitted and other repro- ductive tract infections. Geneva, World Health Organization. Xie Zhenming et al. (2000). Family planning and women’s lives in three provinces of the People’s Republic of China. Washington DC, The Futures Group International. Published in China as Xie Zhenming, ed. Birth planning and women’s lives. Beijing, China Population Press [in Chinese]. Xie Zhenming et al.(2007). Quality of care in family planning and reproductive health services: guide on quality of care in family planning in China. Beijing, China Population Publishing House [in Chinese]. Zhou Jian et al. (2007). The relationship of anemia among fertile women with intrauterine devices. Chinese Journal of Family Planning, 4:207–212. Zhuang Liu-qi et al. (1988). Relation between the ten- sion and the expulsion rate in the use of stainless steel ring IUDs. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 23:231–232. Publications and other documents referring to the systematic reviews Che Yan et al. (2005). Uterine cavity-shaped device used in China. Chinese Journal of Family Plan- ning, 13:94–98 [in Chinese]. Ding Yonggang et al. (2005). Systematic review of the efficacy, common side-effects and continuation rates of daily pills in China. Chinese Journal of Family Planning, 13:222–225 [in Chinese]. Ding Yonggang et al. (2005). Systematic review of the safety of daily pills in China. Chinese Journal of Family Planning, 13:278–283 [in Chinese]. Ding Yonggang et al. (2005). Systematic review of once-a-month pills in China. Chinese Journal of Family Planning, 13:348–352 [in Chinese]. Fang Ke-juan et al. (2004). Report of systematic review of commonly used oral contraceptives and IUD in China. Shanghai, Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research. Fang Ke-juan et al. (2005). An introduction to the methodology of systematic reviews of commonly used oral contraceptives and currently used intrauterine devices. Chinese Journal of Family Planning, 13:17–20 [in Chinese]. Fang Ke-juan et al. (2005). The conclusions and sug- gestions of systematic reviews of commonly used oral contraceptives and currently used intrauter- ine devices. Chinese Journal of Family Planning, 13:352–355 [in Chinese]. Fang Ke-juan et al. (2007). Once-a-month contracep- tive pills in China: a review of available evidence. Contraception, 75:337–343. Liu Shan-min et al. (2005). Systematic review of medicated copper ring 165. Chinese Journal of Family Planning, 13:158–161 [in Chinese]. Meirik O (2005). Once-a-month pills: summary for specialist panel. Unpublished document. San- tiago. 2003, revised 2005. Meirik O (2007). Assessment–review–outcome (draft). Unpublished document. Santiago, 2007. Sun Yuelian et al. (2005). Systematic review of visit- ing pills used in China. Chinese Journal of Family Planning, 13:162–165 [in Chinese]. Sun Yuelian et al. (2005). Systematic review of emer- gency contraceptives. Chinese Journal of Family Planning, 13:217–222 [in Chinese]. Zhou Wei-jin et al. (2005). Systematic review of TCu380A, TCu220C and MLCu375. Chinese Journal of Family Planning, 13:87–93 [in Chi- nese]. 28 HRP External evaluation 2003–2007 Publications and other documents referring to the Chongqing assessment Bu Lingling et al. (2004). Investigation on contracep- tive use and service provision in rural areas of Chongqing Municipality and Sichuan Province. Chinese Journal of Family Planning, 5: 283–286 [in Chinese]. Fajans P et al. (2006). Helping public sector health systems innovate: the Strategic Approach to strengthening reproductive health policies and programs. American Journal of Public Health, 96:435–440. Fang Kejuan et al. (2002). A strategic assessment of the need for contraceptive introduction in Chongqing Municipality, China. Chinese Journal of Family Planning 75:38-43 [in Chinese]. WHO (2002). A strategic assessment of the need for contraceptive introduction in Chongqing Munici- pality, China. Geneva, World Health Organization (WHO/RHR/02.10). Yao Huijie et al. (2006). Metaphase evaluation of increasing clients’ satisfaction on currently used contraception and improving quality of fam- ily planning service. Provision in rural areas of Chongqing Municipality and Sichuan Province. Chinese Journal of Family Planning, 5:274–277 [in Chinese]. Other relevant references Chen Xiaoqin et al. (2003). Survey of IUD replac- ing status in Sichuan, PR China. Contraception, 67:379–383. Hall PE (2005). A study on the manufacture of hormo- nal contraceptives in China, India and Thailand. Morges, Partners for Population and Develop- ment. Khanna J, Maurice J, eds. (2002). China to upgrade its IUD technology. Progress in Reproductive Health Research, 60:4–6. Li Ying (1998). A study on the effect of traditional con- traception services and modern quality services on contraceptive choice, use and continuation in Jiangsu, China. Unpublished document. Nanjing, Jiangsu Family Planning Research Institute, Cen- tre for Epidemiology in Reproductive Health. National Population and Family Planning Commis- sion (2004). China population and development country report. Beijing. National Population and Family Planning Commission (2006). Basic data on China’s population and family planning. Unpublished document. Beijing. Sang Guo-wei et al. (1995). A multicentred phase III comparative clinical trial of Mesigyna, Cyclofem and injectable No. 1 given by monthly intramus- cular injection to Chinese women. I. Contracep- tive efficacy and side effects. Contraception, 51:167–183. Sang Guo-wei et al. (1995). A multicentred phase III comparative clinical trial of Mesigyna, Cyclofem and injectable No. 1 given by monthly intra- muscular injection to Chinese women. II. The comparison of bleeding patterns. Contraception, 51:185–192. Sun Yibin, Zhu Pengdi (1997). A review of studies of once-a-month oral contraceptives in China. Jour- nal of Reproductive Medicine, 6(Suppl 1):1–10. WHO (1997). Long-term reversible contraception. Twelve years of experience with the TCu380A and TCu220C. Contraception, 56:341–352. WHO (2002). Making decisions about contraceptive introduction: a guide for conducting assessments to broaden contraceptive choice and improve quality of care. Geneva (WHO/RHR/02.11). WHO (2002). The Strategic Approach to improving reproductive health policies and programmes: a summary of experiences. Geneva, World Health Organization. WHO (2005). Sexually transmitted and other repro- ductive tract infections – a guide to essential practice. Geneva, World Health Organization. WHO (2007). The WHO Strategic Approach to strengthening sexual and reproductive health policies and programmes. Geneva, World Health Organization (WHO/RHR/07.7). Xiao Bilian (2007). Review article: Chinese experi- ence with intrauterine devices. Contraception, 75:S31–S34. Improving the safety and effectiveness of contraception in China 29 Since 1979, HRP has provided technical and ﬁnancial assistance to establish and strengthen a network of research institutions that can address China’s needs in the ﬁeld of contraception and sexual and reproductive health. HRP has supported a broad array of research, training and capacity- building activities in China, with the aim of enabling Chinese institutions to conduct research on sexual and reproductive health to the highest possible sci- entiﬁc and ethical standards. For the ﬁrst 10 years, until about 1990, HRP was alone in capacity devel- opment in China’s research programme in family planning and sexual and reproductive health, includ- ing training fellowships abroad. Collaboration with the Western nongovernmental organizations that now work in China was negligible or nonexistent. HRP’s collaboration with China began in 1979, with major support to the Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research and the National Research Institute for Family Planning, Beijing. The National Research Institute, and later institutes in Chengdu and Tianjin, were supported by UNFPA projects that were managed by HRP and renewed throughout the 1980s. HRP support continued at the same pace in Shanghai while adding institutes in Hangzhou and, later, Peking University, Peking Union Medical Col- lege Hospital and the National Toxicology Centre in Shanghai. Support to the national network evolved as the institutes established their facilities and recruited and trained research staff. They gradually broad- ened their research agendas from an initial empha- sis on contraceptive research and development to include a variety of social science research programmes that addressed the needs of the national population and family planning programme and sexual and reproductive health care. As the centres became established, both nationally and internationally, HRP provided support for research management at national and institutional levels to help national and institute directors maximize the effectiveness of their resources. Shanghai in particular received advice on resource development and diversiﬁcation of its funding base. Out of these efforts has grown a network of 16 research institutes throughout China that are engaged in a wide range of research and train- ing activities, covering all aspects of sexual and reproductive health. These institutes are gener- ally judged to have excellent research facilities, with competent scientists who are able to deter- mine their research priorities, design appropriate research projects and conduct them to high stan- dards of professionalism. In addition to research relevant to the sexual and reproductive health needs of China, the institutes participate increas- Annex 1. The case-study in the context of HRP’s broader contribution When China began to open to Western countries, in 1978, WHO was the ﬁrst United Nations agency to establish an ofﬁce in China, and HRP was the ﬁrst WHO pro- gramme to send a mission to China, in early 1979. Soon thereafter, a group of Chinese scientists visited Geneva, and an HRP team went to Shanghai and Beijing in October 1979 and established collaboration with the Shang- hai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research. “SIPPR was just a name and there were a handful of scientists occupying rooms in vari- ous old houses in what had been the foreign sections of town.” A UNFPA mission also went to Beijing in October 1979, and in 1980 UNFPA launched its ﬁrst country programme. HRP was the executing body for the UNFPA project that supported capacity development in Beijing. (Information provided by Frank Webb, a former staff member of HRP who helped to establish HRP’s presence in China.) 30 HRP External evaluation 2003–2007 ingly in WHO’s global research efforts, including HRP’s multinational trials, and provide technical support to other countries, especially in the Asia– Paciﬁc region. The institutes that collaborate most closely with HRP are now self-sufﬁcient. Of the primary institutions, seven are ofﬁcially designated WHO collaborating centres. Both the Chinese Government and HRP have made strong, persistent commitments to support and promote mutual cooperation. Likewise, HRP and UNFPA have collaborated over the years in a complementary way. Between 1979 and 2003, total funding was approximately US$ 30 million, with US$ 17 million from HRP’s funds and about US$ 13 million from UNFPA (provided until 1996 to support four of the research institutions through country projects funded by UNFPA and executed by HRP). The Chinese Government has invested at least twice the combined WHO and UNFPA input, covering all the costs of capital construction, staff salaries and other running costs. Overall, the return on the HRP and UNFPA invest- ment has been good, because of a combination of factors unique to China: the high priority given by the Government to population matters and sexual and reproductive health, especially family plan- ning; the Government’s recognition of the value of research in support of public health policy, programmes and interventions; generous ﬁnancial support from national and provincial authori- ties for infrastructure and running costs; and the centuries-old tradition of science in China. The centres remain the backbone of China’s research in population and family planning (undated WHO Memorandum, Frank Webb). The developments associated with the nearly three decades of HRP presence are widely regarded as an outstanding example of successful collaboration between a developing country and a United Nations specialized agency. Research projects funded by HRP The research described in this case-study is part of a much wider collaboration. The research under way in 2007 is listed below (from Katherine Ba- Thike, HRP Asia Desk Manager). Post-ovulatory methods of fertility regulations� : National Research Institute for Family Planning, Beijing; International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Shanghai; and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Mary Hospi- tal, Hong Kong. Phase III trial of testosterone undecanoates� as a male contraceptive was completed in 2007: family planning research institutes of Henan, Yunnan, Sichuan, Hebei, Jiangsu; National Research Institute for Family Planning, Beijing; Institute of Family Planning, Tongji Medical Uni- versity, Hubei; Zhejiang Institute of Planned Par- enthood Research, Zhejiang; and Birth Control Institution, Guizhou. Phases II and III of the Strategic Approachs� con- tinued in Yunnan, increasing access and quality of care for a range of sexual and reproductive health services for the poorest people of the Province. The counterpart institution is the Reproductive Health Research Institute of Kun- ming Medical University. Follow-up of Strategic Approach for reproduc-s� tive tract and sexually transmitted infections (programme guidance tool) in Shenzen and Yun- nan in activities implemented by the Ministry of Health, the National Population and Family Plan- ning Commission and other WHO collaborating centres, with support from the WHO–UNFPA Strategic Partnership Programme (described below). Study on household economic costs of maternal s� mortality in rural China was ﬁnalized. The part- ner and implementing agency: Mother and Child Improving the safety and effectiveness of contraception in China 31 Health Department, School of Public Health, University of Peking, Beijing. Results became available on s� parent–child com- munication on sexual and reproductive matters and the impact of community-based interven- tions for sexual and reproductive health. Projects initiated during the year included: s� reproductive health risks among unmarried Tibetan and Yi youth and parents’ perspective on provision of sexual and reproductive health services for unmarried youth. A study funded at the end of 2007 will assess s� the sexual and reproductive health needs of workers in the entertainment sector in Sichuan Province. A scientiﬁc writing workshop for biomedical s� researchers was conducted in Nanjing (27 par- ticipants). The one-week version of the WHO training s� curriculum on ‘Gender and rights in reproduc- tive health’, focusing speciﬁcally on maternal health, was conducted by the Chinese Ministry of Health. In 2006, the secretariat was invited to lead an s� external evaluation of a one-year rural health project conducted in 97 poor rural counties in China, supported by the World Bank and the United Kingdom Department for International Development. The evaluation was concluded in June 2007. The ﬁndings are available in both English and Chinese. Support for research on s� identiﬁcation of the function of MNSF-beta at implantation was provided to a mid-level researcher from Shang- hai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research, Shanghai, who had returned from an MSc train- ing course in Australia. The report of the study on s� prevalence of lower genital tract infection in rural women in Sichuan Province was ﬁnalized. Intensiﬁed focus for the WHO– UNFPA Strategic Partnership Programme China is one of the countries participating in this joint WHO-UNFPA programme. The team is composed of representatives from the Ministry of Health (Department of Mother and Child Health), the National Population and Family Planning Com- mission, the Women and Children Health Centre of Peking University, Beijing, and programme ofﬁcers from the WHO and UNFPA country ofﬁces. Translation of the Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use wheel and Family planning: a global handbook for providers was undertaken by a team from the National Research Institute for Fam- ily Planning, Beijing, a WHO collaborating centre. The Commission disseminated the wheel and the Decision-making tool for family planning clients and providers in limited numbers in all counties. Family planning training for Ministry of Health service providers is essential, as both married and unmarried clients seek services at Ministry clinics, whereas the Commission’s clinics cater only for married women. This has been recognized as an issue for post-abortion care that is not adequately addressed. A handbook on family planning for county-level providers was being written for the Ministry of Health by the same team of experts who translated the family planning guidelines for the Commission. A revised version of the handbook for providers on reproductive tract and sexually transmitted infec- tions was prepared, printed and distributed. A new pamphlet on sexually transmitted infections in men 32 HRP External evaluation 2003–2007 was prepared, in addition to four other pamphlets. Training materials for courses on reproductive tract and sexually transmitted infections were designed, and meetings to introduce the guidelines were fol- lowed by provincial and county-level training, with upgrading of laboratories to conduct diagnostic tests for these infections. Implementation is under way in the six counties involved in the ﬁrst year of support from the WHO–UNFPA Strategic Partner- ship Programme and in ﬁve new counties. Following translation of The WHO Reproductive Health Library and a national training-of-trainers workshop in Shanghai, provincial training work- shops were conducted in Chengdu, Hangzhou, Shanghai and Tianjin. HRP-supported research centres in China Eight centres share one resource maintenance grant: Institute of Population Research, Peking Univer-s� sity, Beijing Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, s� Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing National Research Institute of Family Planning, s� Beijing Sichuan Family Planning Research Institute, s� Chengdu Family Planning Research Institute of Zhejiang, s� Hangzhou Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood s� Research, Shanghai Tianjin Municipal Research Institute for Family s� Planning, Tianjin National Evaluation Centre for the Toxicology of s� Fertility Regulation Drugs, Shanghai The ﬁrst seven are ofﬁcially designated WHO col- laborating centres. The work of the eight centres is shown in Table 1 below. Improving the safety and effectiveness of contraception in China 33 Table 1. HRP-supported research centres in China and their research focus Centre Research and new features Institute of Population Research, Peking University, Beijing Research : Key issues related to the economy in transition of China, health and the environment Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Peking Union Med- ical College Hospital, Beijing The WHO collaborating centre status of the Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Division was extended to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, which coordinates the national programme on prenatal screen- ing for fetal chromosomal abnormalities and neural tube defects Research : Basic and clinical research on long-term, small-dose hormone replacement therapy for postmenopausal women National Research Institute of Family Planning, Beijing Research : Of 20 projects, 10 are HRP multicentre trials on: male hormonal contraception, emergency contraception and post-ovulatory fertility regula- tion, IUDs and incidence and risk factors for pelvic inﬂammatory disease after induced abortion A new centre – the Social Medical Centre – conducts research on quality of care in family planning programmes in midwest China and cross-border studies with neighbouring countries on sexual and reproductive health issues and HIV/AIDS Tianjin Municipal Research Insti- tute for Family Planning, Tianjin Research : Emergency contraception, vaginal microbicides, prevalence of reproductive tract and sexually transmitted infections and cervical cancer screening; a study on sexual and reproductive health of middle-school stu- dents HRP-supported research : long-term follow-up of IUDs Sichuan Family Planning Research Institute, Chengdu Research : Of 16 projects, seven are supported by HRP on: long-term follow-up of IUDs; long-acting male hormonal contraception; contracep- tive effectiveness of female and male condoms; prevalence of lower genital tract infection in rural women in Sichuan Province; and effects of long-term androgen administration on the prostate Family Planning Research Insti- tute of Zhejiang, Hangzhou Research : Reproductive biology, transdermal drug delivery systems for post- menopausal hormone replacement therapy, and family planning and repro- ductive tract infection service delivery Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research, Shanghai Research : 71 projects, 16 initiated in 2004; basic and clinical research on contraception, quality of sexual and reproductive health services, HIV pre- vention and sexual and reproductive health advocacy, and community-based sexual and reproductive health services for unmarried young people The Department of Epidemiology and Social Science Research set up a new branch of molecular epidemiology National Evaluation Centre for the Toxicology of Fertility Regu- lation Drugs, Shanghai Research : 14 ongoing projects: establishment of toxicology assessment techniques and assessment of the reproductive and genetic toxicology of fertility regulation drugs 34 HRP External evaluation 2003–2007 In China, it is difﬁcult to calculate changes in IUD use over time or the beneﬁts resulting from HRP’s investment in improving contraceptive safety and effectiveness, as ﬁrm data on overall contraceptive use (e.g. prevalence and methods used) are not available. First, as noted in the text, contracep- tive services are provided through two separate systems: the family planning system under the National Population and Family Planning Commis- sion and the health care system under the Ministry of Health. Both are in the public sector, but they do not share service statistics. No single ofﬁce or function compiles overall family planning and sexual and reproductive health data. At the lowest level of service delivery, the family planning worker (under the Commission) may also be a health worker (under the Ministry), reporting various data upwards to both systems, but this var- ies. China has over 1 million family planning work- ers, and their reporting of family planning service statistics is not standardized; until recently at least, each county in China had its own reporting form. In general, the forms specify name, occupation, mari- tal status, ﬁrst marriage date, total pregnancies, total live births, total living children, contraception status, type of contraception used, time of start and discontinuation and, in some cases, reason for discontinuation (Xiao Shaobo. Minutes of workshop on surveillance of adverse reactions to contracep- tives in China, Atlanta, Georgia, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2001). For the two commonest methods, IUDs and ster- ilization, Commission sources estimate that the family planning system and the health system (Ministry) each provides about 50% of all services nationwide (Table 1). The Commission provides the bulk of IUD services in the rural areas where most Chinese live, while Ministry of Health hospitals and clinics provide most of the IUD and sterilization services in the cities and many of the sterilizations in rural areas as well. Second, no data on the numbers of each type of IUD purchased or inserted each year in the Com- mission’s national family planning programme are publicly available. The Commission’s Contraceptive Supply Department receives and ﬁlls orders sent from the provinces on the basis of the current pro- curement list. The Department holds order data as well as data on how many IUDs of each type it has purchased from each manufacturer in a given year, but this is procurement-sensitive information which is not shared with other departments of the Com- mission. Family planning clinics do report service statistics to the Commission in Beijing, including the numbers of IUDs inserted and removed in a given year. The Commission aggregates these data, but the numbers of each speciﬁc type of IUD are not routinely aggregated and not systemati- cally reported. Some service statistics forms may include a section for staff to check the type of IUD, but it is not clear how widespread this practice is. This case-study nevertheless identiﬁed an excep- tion: data provided by the Commission’s Con- Annex 2. The data dilemma Table 1. Provision of IUD and sterilization services by the family planning system and by the Ministry of Health system Family planning system Ministry of Health system Nationwide 50% 50% Rural areas (~70% of population) 70–80% 20–30% Urban areas (~30% of population) 10% 90% Improving the safety and effectiveness of contraception in China 35 traceptive Supply Department to the Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research for the systematic reviews. These data showed that, in 2001, before the systematic reviews, copper-Ts were clearly on the way to replacing copper rings in the national family planning programme (see Table 2). The data showed that 10–11 million IUDs were being purchased annually for the programme by the Commission during the three-year period 1999–2001. During these three years, the total number of TCu 220C and TCu-380A IUDs supplied centrally to the national family planning programme was 11.50 million, signiﬁcantly more than the 7.07 million copper rings supplied during the same period. The largest quantity of IUDs supplied by the Commission, however, were uterine-shaped copper IUDs made in China (13.22 million). When the HRP-supported systematic reviews of the cop- per ring 165 and other IUDs began in 2002, the Commission was supplying almost 2 million copper rings per year to the national programme, slightly more than 22% of all the IUDs it supplied. In actual usage, however, the proportion of copper rings being inserted was much greater than 22%, given that many local ofﬁcials preferred to purchase the cheaper, more familiar copper ring. Third, the centrally provided contraceptives are only a portion of what family planning clinics pro- vide, but no data are available on the quantities of contraceptives purchased by local government or provincial family planning ofﬁces. The family plan- ning clinics and their local governments must buy the remainder of the contraceptives they supply, perhaps between 40% and 60%, from commercial manufacturers. Especially in rural and poor areas, they tend to buy the cheaper products, e.g. the copper ring and once-a-month pills, even though these are no longer on the central procurement list. A fourth difﬁculty in seeking to determine the num- bers of contraceptives used is the rapidly expand- ing volume of sales of contraceptives and services through the private commercial sector (clinics and pharmacies). Increasingly, many people, especially those who are young and unmarried, go to private- sector pharmacies to buy contraceptive pills as well as condoms, which have become increasingly popular with heightened awareness of AIDS and sexually transmitted infections and as unmar- ried persons have become more sexually active. Migrants are also major consumers of private-sec- tor contraceptive services. Data are not available on the volume of these sales. Table 2. IUDs supplied to the national family planning programme by the National Population and Family Planning Com- mission contraceptive supplies centre during 1999–2001 (millions) Type of IUD 1999 2000 2001 Total Total % Uterine-shaped copper IUD, non-medicated 3.80 4.05 3.72 11.57 13.22 42% Uterine-shaped copper IUD, medicated 0.50 0.36 0.79 1.65 TCu 220C 2.61 3.08 3.83 9.52 9.52 30% Copper ring 165, non-medicated 2.02 1.18 1.63 4.83 7.07 22% Copper ring 165 (MCR165), medicated 1.52 0.48 0.24 2.24 TCu 380A 0.59 0.56 0.83 1.98 1.98 6% Total 11.04 9.71 11.04 31.79 31.79 100% Source: Liu Shan-min et al. (2005) Systematic review of medicated copper ring 165. Chinese Journal of Family Planning, 13:158–161. 36 HRP External evaluation 2003–2007 The Strategic Approach A Strategic Approach to strengthening sexual and reproductive health policies and programmes was conceptualized by HRP’s Task Force for Con- traceptive Introduction in 1991 to ensure quality of care (including needs and rights) rather than an exclusive focus on contraceptive technology (products and devices) (see box). The method has been used in about 30 countries to identify and set priorities on sexual and reproductive health service needs, test appropriate interventions and scale up successful innovations (Simmons et al., 1997; WHO 2000a,b; Fajans et al., 2006). The Strategic Approach provides not only a systematic approach to assessing services but also opportunities to introduce new ideas. The Strategic Approach comprises three stages. The ﬁrst stage is a strategic assessment of the current situation and consideration of alternative approaches. A multidisciplinary team that includes senior decision-makers conducts ﬁeldwork. New data are gathered by a predominantly qualitative approach involving interviews and observations. The method was ﬁrst used in China in 1998 to evaluate the introduction of quality of care into the ﬁrst six pilot-counties of the project implemented by the National Population and Family Planning Commission since 1995 with support from the Ford Foundation (Ma Li et al., 1998). The 20-member evaluation team included an HRP consultant and Chinese policy-makers. The process contributed to better understanding of quality of care. Two partici- pants in this evaluation subsequently participated in and conveyed their experiential learning to the Chongqing strategic assessment. Chongqing assessment The report of the Chongqing strategic assess- ment in 2000 (WHO, 2002) gives a wide range of ﬁndings and recommendations. Chinese partici- pants welcomed the technical guidance provided throughout the assessment by HRP, which included assistance for planning, ﬁeld work, report writing and dissemination. The ﬁndings and recommen- dations covered many aspects of quality of care. Those most directly related to the contraceptive products are described here. IUDs : The assessment showed that the IUD is well accepted by many women and is preferred for its long life-span, reversibility and effectiveness and because insertion is free. Many types of IUD were available in the municipality, including the copper ring, TCu220C, TCu380A, Multiload, uterine- shaped IUD with 200 mm² or 300 mm² copper, ‘ﬁxed pattern’ and gamma. The types available at township level also varied extensively. IUDs were Annex 3. Most relevant ﬁndings of the Chongqing strategic assessment Key features of the Strategic Approach A philosophy of sexual and reproductive s� health that embraces reproductive rights, gender equity and social justice. Linkage between the strategic needs s� assessment, applied service delivery research and scaling-up of successful inno- vations. A client-centred framework for identifying s� and correcting the management, technical, sociocultural and resource problems that affect the provision of equitable access to appropriate services of good quality in a health system. Country ownership and a participatory s� process for involving programme manag- ers, policy-makers and other stakeholders, including service providers, researchers, social scientists, women’s health advocates and inﬂuential leaders of women’s, youth and community groups. Source : Fajans et al., 2006. Improving the safety and effectiveness of contraception in China 37 available in up to three sizes, pre-sterilized or not, with or without a disposable inserter, and some contained indomethacin to decrease bleeding during the three months after insertion. Very few (other than the copper-Ts) had strings attached for removal. In some townships, more than 10 types or varia- tions of IUDs were available, but in many clinics only the cheaper IUDs were supplied (e.g. copper rings without disposable inserters or the uterine- shaped IUD, which was not sterilized and had no disposable inserter), because the cost of the IUD took precedence over other characteristics, such as effectiveness. Both the programme managers and providers who were interviewed considered that the characteristics of IUDs are important and also that women should be offered a wide choice of IUDs. Each type of IUD generally requires a speciﬁc technique for insertion and removal and generally has a speciﬁc life-span. The providers were not always well informed about when an IUD should be replaced, and the team found that IUDs were usually not removed and replaced when their period of recommended effectiveness had ended and were often not removed from women reaching menopause. The team also saw evidence that IUDs and their inserters were not always sterilized cor- rectly, and expired IUDs were often found in service facilities. Quarterly ultrasound check: In almost all the town- ships visited, women with an IUD had an ultra- sound check every three months to ensure their IUD remained correctly in place. While women expressed a variety of views about this quarterly IUD follow-up, there was considerable dissatisfac- tion with the fact that the check was limited to ultrasound to verify the presence of the IUD and did not address side-effects or women’s health. The team recommended that IUD follow-up be con- ducted according to established evidence-based medical criteria. It further recommended that the quarterly ultrasound checks be discontinued, as they represented unnecessary medical care and were costly in terms of personnel and other resource requirements. Hormonal methods : Many hormonal contraceptive methods were available throughout the municipal- ity, including a variety of brands of daily pills, once- a-month pills, visiting pills and emergency contra- ception pills. The variety of types and brands led to considerable confusion among both providers and clients concerning the method characteristics and appropriate use (e.g. medical eligibility for speciﬁc methods, follow-up and management of complica- tions). Multiplicity and quality of products : Past emphasis on the introduction of new methods led to a prolif- eration of contraceptives in the programme, which resulted in a deterioration rather than an improve- ment in quality of care. The assessment team expressed concern that, in addition to the wide variety of similar methods provided, a number of the contraceptives were not of optimal efﬁcacy and were in some cases of uncertain safety. Accord- ing to the Science and Technology Department of the National Population and Family Planning Commission, such problems were common to the programme in other geographical areas as well and were thus key issues to be addressed to promote quality of care and informed choice. Informed choice : The assessment team found that both users and members of the community were unfamiliar with the concept of informed choice. While women were aware of some changes in practice, most did not know that the current family planning policy gave them the choice of methods other than the IUD. Providers also did not fully understand the concept of personal choice in selecting a contraceptive method. 38 HRP External evaluation 2003–2007 New guiding framework for quality of care HRP’s Strategic Approach gave China a better understanding of quality of care and contributed to the larger movement for quality of care that has been transforming the family planning programme. The ‘triangle’ graphic introduced in the Strategic Approach was greeted by Chinese colleagues as an effective tool for presenting the elements involved in improving quality of care: addressing clients, quality services and good management within the existing social, political and cultural contexts. “The best of this project was that the strategic assessment changed our thinking,” said a member of the Chongqing assessment team. “The triangle was very powerful for conveying this concept and change. From 1980 when I began working in this ﬁeld, there was always the population control approach, never any mention of service. With Judith Bruce’s six elements of quality of care, we began to realize the importance of service and these elements. But the Strategic Approach was most important; it included the technical dimension which Judith Bruce didn’t. Six elements was just a list. The triangle of the Strategic Approach repre- sented and communicated in quick way—gave us a new vision and path!” An evaluation of the Strategic Approach concluded that it had broken new ground by applying a sys- tems perspective to sexual and reproductive health policies and programmes. This is represented in The systems framework guiding the Strategic Approach World Health Organization. The WHO Strategic Approach to strengthening sexual and reproductive health policies and programmes. Geneva, 2007. So cia l, c ult ura l, eco nomic and political contextsPeopleNeeds, rights, perspectives Policy and Institutional capacities Services and technologies Laws/regulations Human/physical resources Management, Financing Equitable access Quality of care Mix of interventions Improving the safety and effectiveness of contraception in China 39 the triangle set in the circle. The framework has been used in China in speeches by Zhang Wei- qing, Minister of the National Population and Family Planning Commission, and most recently provided the structure for a guide on quality of care in fam- ily planning in China (Xie Zhenming et al., 2007), which will be inﬂuential in improving sexual and reproductive health services in China (see photo – Discussion at a provincial workshop emphasizing that the guide on quality of care in family planning in China is organized around the elements in the graphic). Continued use of the method In addition to “changing the way of thinking” about programme implementation, the method itself continues to inﬂuence some research. The Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research team has implemented the second stage of the approach, action research, in Sichuan Province. Other researchers say it has a direct inﬂuence on how they design research, even if they are not fully implementing the method. Upon request, HRP has subsequently supported implementation of the Strategic Approach in two additional contexts in China. One is in Yunnan Province, addressing access to services by the poor, including the serious issues posed by China’s ‘ﬂoating population’ of migrants from poor rural areas, numbering in the millions, isolated rural women and the border areas that are the centre of China’s AIDS epidemic. A programme guidance tool based on the Strategic Approach has also been used in reproductive tract and sexually transmitted diseases programming. References Fajans P et al. (2006) Helping public sector health systems innovate: the Strategic Approach to strengthening reproductive health policies and programs. American Journal of Public Health, 96:435-440. Ma Li et al. (1998) General report of the evaluation of the pilot sites of quality of care of the National Family Planning Commission. Beijing (unpub- lished report prepared for the State Family Plan- ning Commission). Simmons R et al. (1997) The Strategic Approach to contraceptive introduction. Studies in Family Planning, 28:79–94. WHO (2000a) Making decisions about contraceptive introduction: a guide for conducting assessments to broaden contraceptive choice and improve quality of care. Geneva, World Health Organiza- tion (WHO/RHR/02.11). WHO (2000b) The Strategic Approach to improving reproductive health policies and programmes: a summary of experiences. Geneva, World Health Organization (unpublished document). WHO (2002) A strategic assessment of the need for contraceptive introduction in Chongqing Munici- pality, China (WHO/RHR/02.10). Geneva, World Health Organization. Xie Zhenming et al. (2007) Quality of care in family planning and reproductive health services: guide on quality of care in family planning in China. Beijing, China Population Publishing House [in Chinese]. Ph ot o co ur te sy o f R ut h Si m m on s 40 HRP External evaluation 2003–2007 HRP and its two key partners, the National Population and Family Planning Commission and the Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research, designed an innovative workplan, which built on the Cochrane systematic review method. Had the reviews been carried out strictly according to that method (see box), however, their ﬁndings might never have captured the attention of policy- makers. The key to success was involvement of stakeholders in the review from the outset, with continued engagement through a series of experts’ meetings in an iterative, consensus-seeking, two- year process. institutions, national and regional family plan- ning research institutes and the pharmaceutical industry. They afﬁrmed that the purpose of the review was to assess safety and effectiveness of commonly used contraceptives in order to provide a basis for rational, evidence-based selection and management of the contraceptives that the Com- mission provides to the national family planning programme. Half of the three-day workshop was devoted to the method of systematic reviews of health techniques, presented by an HRP consultant and an expert from the China Cochrane Centre. Two groups were formed, one to prepare a frame- work for the systematic review of hormonal contra- ceptives and the other to prepare a framework for the review of IUDs. They agreed that seven reviews would be conducted, three concerning IUDs (the copper ring 165, other copper IUDs developed and manufactured in China and copper IUDs devel- oped in the West but manufactured in China), and four reviews on hormonal contraceptives (daily combined oral contraceptive pills, once-a-month oral contraceptive pills, progestogen-only visiting pills and emergency contraceptive pills). The main outcome variables for each contraceptive product would be effectiveness, safety and continuation rate, as a proxy for acceptability. Second experts’ meeting. In November 2002, a two-day meeting of national experts was convened in Shanghai, during which the research group of the Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research presented the framework for the sys- tematic review and delivered draft reports on the medicated copper ring 165, once-a-month pills and visiting pills. The experts provided valuable sug- gestions for completing the reviews. Third experts’ meeting. In January 2004, the Shanghai Institute convened a two-day consensus meeting, the goal of which was to agree on recom- mendations to be forwarded to the Commission. Annex 4. The systematic reviews and the process of engagement The Cochrane Systematic Review The review begins with a comprehensive, systematic search for all published and unpublished literature on the issue under review. The next step is to examine the trials that are found by a priori criteria, accord- ing to the method and principles of clinical epidemiology proposed by the Cochrane Col- laboration, to determine whether the studies meet the eligibility criteria for the review. Eligible studies are then pooled for qualita- tive and quantitative analyses when feasible. When well conducted, this type of review provides a basis for reliable, comprehensive conclusions about the effectiveness and safety of health interventions. Experts’ meeting, April 2002. To launch the review process, the Commission brought together national and international experts to discuss priorities and strategies for the systematic review. The participants included senior staff of the Science and Technology Department and the Contracep- tion Supply Department of the Commission, HRP staff, family planning specialists from academic Improving the safety and effectiveness of contraception in China 41 The Shanghai Institute research team presented the conclusions and preliminary recommendations of all seven systematic reviews. Each presenta- tion was followed by discussion and formulation of a draft recommendation to the Commission. The Shanghai Institute research team, together with HRP experts, then ﬁnalized the reports and pre- pared a summary report of the consensus reached by the participating experts. National dissemination workshop. In April 2004, a two-day workshop was held in Shanghai to present the results of the systematic reviews on the IUDs and oral hormonal contraceptives commonly used in China. There was general agreement about the importance of the reviews. The National Expert Group noted that it was the ﬁrst attempt in China to perform a comprehensive systematic review of commonly used IUDs and oral contraceptives and that the reviews made it clear that many of the contraceptive methods had not been evaluated since they were ﬁrst marketed. They recognized that the method used was in accordance with international standards, and judged the research project of great importance and practical signiﬁ- cance for improving the level of clinical family plan- ning research in China, enhancing management and use of fertility-regulating methods, advancing quality of care as well as popularizing the method of systematic review. The two-year review showed which contraceptives ranked well in safety, effec- tiveness and acceptability and which did not. The recommendations from the reviews were for- warded to the leadership of the National Population and Family Planning Commission, which, express- ing conﬁdence in the process, made the important decision to discontinue purchasing and providing the copper ring IUD and the three hormonal contra- ceptives that did not meet the criteria of safety and effectiveness. Participants in the systematic reviews Expert group Wang Yi-fei, Professor, Shanghai Second Medical University Zhuang Liu-qi, Professor, Shanghai Institute of Family Planning Technical Instruction Cheng Li-nan, Professor, International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Shanghai Li Hui-ting, Professor, Shanghai Institute of Pharmaceutical Industry Wu Yu-hao, Professor, Xin-hua Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Second Medical University Liu Xiao-ai, Professor, Rui-jin Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Second Medical University Wu Xue-ze, Chief Physician, Shanghai First Maternity and Child Health Hospital Xu Jin-xun, Senior Research Fellow, Shanghai Population and Family Planning Commission Li Rui-lin, Professor, Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research Chen Hai-lin, Professor, Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research Gao Er-sheng, Professor, Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research Ding Xun-cheng, Professor, Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research Wu Yu-ming, Professor, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Gu Su-juan, Professor, Beijing Institute of Family Planning Technical Instruction Wu Shang-chun, Senior Research Fellow, National Research Institute for Family Planning Peng Dun-ren, Senior Research Fellow, Tianjing Family Planning Institute Cao Xiao-ming, Senior Research Fellow, Tianjing Family Planning Institute Li Ying, Senior Research Fellow, Family Planning Institute of Jiangsu Province Wang Rong-fen, Senior Research Fellow, Family Planning Institute of Jiangsu Province Liao Qing-jiang, Professor, China Pharmaceutics University Hui Gang, Professor, Nanjing Medical University Lei Zhen-wu, Professor, Sichuan Reproductive Health Institute 42 HRP External evaluation 2003–2007 Cheng Jie-shan, Vice-Chief Physician, Family Planning Institute of Chongqing Municipality Chen He-ping, Vice-Chief Physician, Family Planning Institute of Chongqing Municipality Representatives of the National Population and Family Planning Commission Xiao Shao-bo, Director-General, Science and Technology Department Zhang Shi-kun, Executive Director-General, Science and Technology Department Fu Wei, Deputy Director-General, Science and Technology Department Zhang Li-ming, Division Chief, Science and Technology Department Wang Qiao-mei, Division Chief, Science and Technology Department Shen Hai-ping, Division Vice-Chief, Science and Technology Department Pan Dong, Science and Technology Department Li Lu-yang, Vice-Director, Contraception Supply and Development Centre Li Feng-qi, Division Chief, Contraception Supply and Development Centre Peng Chun-yan, Contraception Supply and Development Centre Ma Su-wen, Contraception Supply and Development Centre Advisors and consultants from WHO/ HRP Dr Olav Meirik Dr Peter Fajans Ms Mary Broderick Dr Kate Curtis Shanghai Institute for Planned Parenthood Research, Research Group Fang Ke-juan, Professor Zhou Wei-jin, Senior Research Fellow Che Yan, Associate Research Fellow Sun Yue-lian, Assistant Research Fellow Ding Yong-gang, Assistant Research Fellow Han Yao-ling, Assistant Research Fellow Improving the safety and effectiveness of contraception in China 43 A national network for post-marketing surveillance of contraceptive methods has been established and has begun systematic monitoring for harmful side-effects and adverse reactions to IUDs and hormonal contraceptives. This Centre for Contra- ceptive Adverse Reaction Surveillance (CARS) is based in Nanjing at the Jiangsu Institute of Planned Parenthood Research. International support came initially from the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), with various inputs from HRP. This activity was not included in the terms of reference for this case-study; however, the National Population and Family Planning Com- mission called attention to it and urged that it be included. Personnel from the Jiangsu Institute attended a WHO-sponsored training workshop on contra- ceptive surveillance at CDC in the late 1990s. In 1998, HRP convened a workshop on contraceptive adverse reaction surveillance in Nanjing, which was attended by several inﬂuential persons, includ- ing the Director of China’s State Food and Drug Administration, the Director of the National Popula- tion and Family Planning Commission’s Science and Technology Department (Dr Xiao Shaobo), Dr Zhao Baige from the National Population and Fam- ily Planning Commission, Dr Olav Meirik from HRP and Professor David Skegg from New Zealand. In 1999, the Centre was formally established in Nan- jing, with support from the Science and Technology Commission of Jiangsu Province. A planning workshop at CDC in 2001 focused on developing a CARS system for China. This received limited support from HRP. Subsequent capacity- building included visits to the Uppsala Monitoring Centre in Sweden (2003), set up by WHO as an international drug monitoring programme, and to New Zealand (2003–2004), recommended by HRP as having an outstanding CARS system, monitoring some 15 000 IUD users. Technological standards have been set for surveil- lance and reporting, a dedicated online database has been established for this purpose, and per- sonnel in Nanjing and the surveillance sites have been trained in the standards and procedures for surveillance and linked with the online database. By 2005, a network of CARS sentinel surveillance sites had been established in 10 pilot counties, one each in 10 provinces. By 2007, this pilot programme had been expanded to 31 (nearly all) of China’s provinces, municipalities and autono- mous regions. About 100 monitoring stations are expected to be operating across China by 2010. Data from township family planning clinics and township hospitals are sent (via the database) to the county family planning agency and then to the CARS Centre in Nanjing. From the Centre, data are sent, as judged appropriate, to the National Population and Family Planning Commission and to the National Centre for Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring, which is under the State Food and Drug Administration. An agreement signed in 2003 sets forth the terms of collaboration between the CARS Centre, the National Centre for Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring and the State Food and Drug Administration. The Centre is using data submitted from the monitoring stations to conduct research on safety, efﬁcacy and risks associated with various contra- ceptives, both hormonal and IUDs. (The database has information on 33 different IUDs.) Data are now available from a two-year surveillance project (October 2005–September 2007). The results show that the CARS online reporting system registered 832 adverse events (e.g. downward displacement, fragmentation and knot loosening, partial expulsion, complete expulsion, infection and ectopic pregnancy) involving 24 types of IUD. Annex 5. Centre for Contraceptive Adverse Reaction Surveillance 44 HRP External evaluation 2003–2007 A progress report was presented at a confer- ence at the National Population and Family Plan- ning Commission in June 2006, and the results were reported in the Chinese ofﬁcial media (http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/200606/22/ eng20060622_276433.html). The Centre received a science and technology award from the Commis- sion in 2006 and is now considered a unit in that body. The principal relevant research carried out at the Centre for Contraceptive Adverse Reac- tion Surveillance, with Chinese Government funding, includes: 2002: a study on surveillance of adverse s� reactions to new contraceptives (key programme in the 10th national ﬁve-year plan) 2004: a study on surveillance for and s� evaluation of the safety of contraceptives (key programme in the 10th national ﬁve- year plan) 2005: effects of use of combined oral s� contraceptives and the ACE and AGT genes on hypertension (National Natural Science Foundation of China) 2006: a study on post-marketing surveil-s� lance and risk re-evaluation for contracep- tives (key programme in the 11th national ﬁve-year plan) Improving the safety and effectiveness of contraception in China 45 Since the beginning of HRP’s collaboration with China’s Government and scientists, there has been concern about ‘once-a-month pills’. In the early 1980s, HRP’s Toxicology Review Panel reportedly recommended that these be removed from use. When the National Population and Family Planning Commission asked HRP to conduct a strategic assessment of contraceptive issues, the wide- spread availability and use of the once-a-month pills was documented (Sun Yibin, Zhu Pengdi, 1997). As a result, in 2003, HRP provided sup- port for a systematic review of the effectiveness, side-effects, safety and acceptability of China’s once-a-month pills. The review concluded that the available data, while limited, indicated that the pills were less safe and less effective than other long-term hormonal contraceptives. The Commis- sion subsequently ended its provision of the pills to China’s national family planning programme, as of 2005. Nevertheless, once-a-month pills continue to be manufactured, used and made available for sale in the private sector in neighbouring countries. Once-a-month pills In the 1960s, various hormonal contraceptive regimens were tested by researchers in China. As a result, three different once-a-month pill for- mulations were developed in 1969. Because of short-term side-effects, of nausea and vomiting, however, a new formulation was produced in the mid-1970s. The once-a-month pills were designed and provided to meet a special need in the fam- ily planning programme. The methods preferred by the programme were sterilization and IUDs; however, for women who experienced substantial side-effects from IUDs, the once-a-month pill was a common alternative. Over the years, family plan- ning workers provided the pill during monthly visits to women in their homes. Although oral contracep- tive pills are used by only a small percentage of Chinese women, the number is still in the millions (see Table 1), and once-a-month pills have been one of the most popular hormonal contraceptive methods in rural China. Annex 6. Once-a-month pills and the monthly injectable contraceptive Table 1. Estimated numbers of married women of reproductive age in China using hormonal contraceptives Total no. mar- ried women of reproductive age (billions) Prevalence of modern methods (%) No. of women using methods (millions) Oral contra- ceptives (% of method mix) No. of women using oral contraceptives (millions) Injectable con- traceptives (% of method mix) No. of women using injectable contraceptives (millions) China, 1997 0.263 83.3 219 1.7 3.7 0.4 0.9 World 1.043 54.0 563 7.2 40.5 2.6 14.6 Source: United Nations Population Division (2003). Mechanism of action The ‘once-a-month’ pill contains 6 mg levonorgestrel (a short-acting progestogen) and 3 mg quinestrol (ethinylestradiol-3-cy- clopentylether), a long-acting estrogen. The estrogen blocks ovulation, and the proges- togen gives rise to a progestogen peak that, as it declines, induces the endometrium to shed in menstruation-like withdrawal bleed- ing. The bleeding typically starts three days after the pill is taken (Fang Ke-juan et al., 2007). 46 HRP External evaluation 2003–2007 Since the beginning of HRP’s collaboration with China (1979), concern has been raised about the once-a-month pill. An HRP Toxicology Panel reviewed these pills around 1980 and recom- mended their discontinuation because of safety concerns. Between 1982 and 1990, a series of coordinated clinical and experimental studies were conducted to examine the safety of the once-a- month pills in rural China. As a result of the ﬁnd- ings, in 1992, the norgestrel pill was removed from the commodities provided to the national family planning programme and was replaced by a levonorgestrel pill. Since 1998, only one once- a-month pill, containing levonorgestrel and quin- estrol, remained on the National Population and Family Planning Commission procurement list. The HRP-supported Chongqing strategic assessment in 2000, however, found several different once- a-month pills available in clinics, including the norgestrel pill (removed from the list in 1992). Of the oral contraceptive pills identiﬁed in the assess- ment, including several types of once-a-month pills, several types of daily pills, several types of visiting pills and four types of emergency contra- ceptive pills (WHO, 2002), the once-a-month pills were the most commonly used. As a result, the HRP-supported systematic reviews conducted by the Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research included a review of data on the safety and effectiveness of the levonorgestrel once-a-month pill (conducted in 2003). The avail- able data were found to be inadequate to assess the safety and effectiveness of the pill deﬁnitively, but it was concluded that it was less safe and less effective than daily pills or combined injectable contraceptives. The conclusions of the review were as follows (Fang Ke-juan et al., 2004; Ding Yong- gang et al., 2005; Meirik, 2005; Fang Ke-juan et al., 2007): The review of once-a-month pills revealed the lack of adequate data to assess the effectiveness and safety of the method. The available data, however, suggest it is less effective than daily pills and combined inject- able contraceptives. The monthly estrogen dose of the once-a-month pill, quinestrol that is metabolized to ethinylestradiol, is 4.5 times the monthly dose of ethinylestradiol of currently used daily pills. The available data concerning safety of quinestrol is incom- plete, but indicates that in the short term a substantial proportion of users complain of nausea, vomiting, and leucorrhoea [a vaginal discharge], and that the incidence of elevated blood pressure can be as high as 7.5%. Studies report adverse shifts of serum lipid proﬁles and liver function tests. The high dose of estrogen of the once-a-month pill gives rise to concerns about its safety in the longer term but there is no information on the long-term safety of this contraceptive. When the results were reported at the national dis- semination meeting in April 2004, the expert group brought together by the Commission agreed (Fang Ke-juan et al., 2004): There is sufﬁcient evidence to state that the dose of CEE [quinestrol], which is metabo- lized to EE, of the once-a-month pills is far too high for it to be safe in longer term use. The rate of short-term side effects of the once-a-month pills is high and the discon- tinuation rate is high. The National Population and Family Planning Commission should start preparations to phase out once-a-month pills. (Later, “as soon as possible” was added at the end of the last sentence.) Improving the safety and effectiveness of contraception in China 47 As a consequence, the Commission’s leadership instructed its Contraceptive Supply Department to remove the levonorgestrel once-a-month pill from the annual procurement list for contraceptive sup- plies to be purchased for the national family plan- ning programme (National Population and Family Planning Commission, 2005). Today, no once-a-month pills are on the list or being centrally purchased and provided by the Commission; however, they are still in use. This continued provision is explained partly by the fact that the Commission provides only a portion of the contraceptives that the family planning clinics provide, and the clinics and their local govern- ments must buy the remainder from commercial manufacturers. This may include purchase of once- a-month pills (and other contraceptives) that are no longer on the Commission procurement list. In addition, the health system under the Ministry of Health and private pharmacies can also buy and provide or sell once-a-month pills. According to researchers at the Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research, many fam- ily planning providers, especially in rural areas, like and still want to provide once-a-month pills. They are the cheapest of all oral contraceptives and much easier to use than a daily pill. Research conducted by the team in 2002–2005 in the Chongqing vicinity found that many family plan- ning workers were still quite insistent on providing once-a-month pills (personal communication, Fang Ke-juan and Zhou Weijin, 2007). Visiting pills. The visiting pills that remain on the Commission procurement list contain high doses of levonorgestrel but are regarded by many Chi- nese family planning leaders and the Army as an essential part of the contraceptive mix. One reason for their popularity is that the Army still considers them important for short-leave family visits. HRP staff recommended eliminating all visiting pills and replacing them with emergency contraception fol- lowed by one month of a daily oral contraceptive pill; however, Chinese colleagues considered that a visiting pill was needed. Use of Chinese once-a-month pills elsewhere in Asia Chinese products, including contraceptives, ﬂow into South-east Asia. Chinese contraceptives are imported into neighbouring countries either through formal commercial sales or through informal chan- nels by local entrepreneurs. Once-a-month pills have reportedly long been available and continue to be so in various countries, including Cambodia, the Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Myanmar, Viet Nam and even Indonesia. In Cambodia, for example, the once-a-month pill has been used extensively and is regularly avail- able from drug sellers. The perceptions of women towards the pill are mixed, as it is more convenient than a daily pill but generally has more side-effects (Sek S et al., 1999). Known as ‘the Chinese pill’ among users, the instructions and contraindica- tions are all in Chinese. A review of reproductive health commodities, undertaken by the United Kingdom Department for International Develop- ment for the Reproductive Health Supplies Coali- tion, including donors and procurement agencies, stated that “Some products are also imported from China. The only contraceptive found was the once-a-month pill. This product, about which WHO has expressed concerns on safety and efﬁcacy, is widely available and because of its price for one month coverage, is used by many poorer women.” (Hall, Chan Chhuong, 2006). The report recom- mended that “Chinese once-a-month pills should be removed from pharmacies because of safety 48 HRP External evaluation 2003–2007 and efﬁcacy concerns.” Although international control mechanisms are being put in place, their impact on changing the availability of these pills may be minimal, according to some knowledgeable sources. In Myanmar, HRP designed training materials for public sector and drug store personnel and other audiences, which emphasized that the Chinese once-a-month pills may be less safe than other oral contraceptives and should not be used. This information was also to be provided in Myanmar Medical Association courses on family planning for general practitioners. Subsequent comparison of pill usage in the 1997 and 2001 Fertility and Reproductive Health Surveys showed a decline in usage of these pills (Myanmar, Ministry of Immigra- tion and Population, 1999; Myanmar, Department of Population, 2003). UNFPA’s country ofﬁce in India supports a task force on contraceptive research, which includes scientists from Government, the Indian Council for Medical Research and UNFPA and provides technical advice on new contraceptive products. In 2005, the task force considered introducing China’s once-a-month pill into India. The proposal was that India would begin importing the Chinese pill and that eventually an Indian company would start to produce it. The results of the review of the once-a-month pill by the Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research were considered (Ding Yong-gang et al., 2005; Fang Ke-juan et al., 2007), and on the basis of the review’s ﬁndings and recommendations, the task force decided that the Chinese pill should not be introduced into India (personal communication, UNFPA country ofﬁce). HRP-supported work contributed to this decision and is a public good with beneﬁts for India. At about the same time, Thailand was also consid- ering importation of the Chinese once-a-month pill. The Institute of Health Research at Chulalongkorn University in Bangkok considered the evidence from the Shanghai Institute review. Subsequently, HRP information sources report, there has been no further discussion or reported formal importation of the pill into Thailand. It is unlikely that formal importation will occur in the future, given that the Thai Food and Drug Administration has applied for membership in the Pharmaceutical Inspections Cooperation Scheme and has begun implementing their recommendations on current good manu- facturing practice for both national and imported products. A once-a-month pill is also manufactured and has been used in the Dominican Republic for several years. Whether its development was linked in any way to the Chinese pill is unclear; however, the report by HRP in Contraception (Fang Ke-juan et al., 2007) that the Chinese once-a-month pill was no longer being provided to the Chinese fam- ily planning programme reportedly resulted in decreased promotion and advertising of the once- a-month pill in the Dominican Republic. Regional and global public goods The decision by the National Population and Fam- ily Planning Commission to stop providing the once-a-month pill to the national family planning programme deﬁnitely constitutes a national public good, with extension to the region. Collaboration and information-sharing by the HRP team was instrumental in the decisions not to introduce the once-a-month pill, especially in India and possibly in Thailand, and this also constitutes a global public good. Continued effort and inﬂuence will, however, be needed, given that once-a-month pills continue to be used in China and exported to South-east Improving the safety and effectiveness of contraception in China 49 Asia, formally or informally. Another indicator of HRP’s contribution to the public good is that in at least one country, Cambodia, use of Chinese once- a-month pills has declined in the past ﬁve years (National Institute of Statistics, Directorate General for Health [Cambodia], and ORC Macro (2001, 2006). Once-a-month injectable contraceptive No. 1 Monthly injectable contraceptives have been used in China for many years, the main product being Injectable No. 1. HRP observed that no well- designed comparative clinical trial on this product had been reported, although it had probably been used by one million Chinese women or more. In 1988, HRP supported a comparative phase III study to evaluate the efﬁcacy and side-effects of Inject- able No. 1. HRP interrupted the study because of the occurrence of an unexpectedly high pregnancy rate during the ﬁrst two months of use in the group given Injectable No. 1. The injection schedule was modiﬁed and the study resumed and completed. The results showed that Injectable No. 1 was less effective than other monthly injectable products (Cyclofem and Mesigyna), that No. 1 was less suitable for monthly administration, and that side- effects resulted in high discontinuation rates (Sang Guo-wei et al., 1995a,b). HRP’s toxicology group expressed its concern to Chinese decision-makers, including the State Pharmaceutical Administra- tion. Injectable No. 1 is no longer supplied by the National Population and Family Planning Commis- sion to the national family planning programme, although it reportedly continues to be manufac- tured, used and exported . Injectable No. 1 was not among the contraceptives on which the systematic reviews were conducted, given HRP funding constraints at the time and the low prevalence of use of this product. Experts have since encouraged the Commission’s Department of Science and Technology to work closely with the Shanghai Institute to continue systematic reviews of additional Chinese contraceptives, including Injectable No. 1. References Ding Yong-gang et al. (2005). Systematic review of the efficacy, common side effects and continua- tion rates of daily pills in China. Chinese Journal of Family Planning, 13:222–225 [in Chinese]. Fang Ke-juan et al. (2004.) Report of systematic review of commonly used oral contraceptives and IUD in China. Shanghai, Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research. Fang Ke-juan et al. (2007). Once-a-month contracep- tive pills in China: a review of available evidence. Contraception, 75:337–343. Hall PE, Chan Chhuong (2006). Reproductive health commodity security. Country case-study: Cambodia. London, Department for International Development, Health Resource Centre. Meirik O (2005). Once-a-month pills: summary for specialist panel. Unpublished document. San- tiago. 2003, revised 2005. Myanmar, Ministry of Immigration and Population (1999). Fertility and Reproductive Health Survey, 1997. Yangon. Myanmar, Department of Population (2003). Fertility and Reproductive Health Survey 2001. Yangon. National Institute of Public Health, National Institute of Statistics [Cambodia], ORC Macro (2006). Cambodia demographic and health survey 2005. Phnom Penh and Calverton, Maryland. National Institute of Statistics, Directorate General for Health [Cambodia], ORC Macro (2001). Cambo- dia demographic and health survey 2000. Phnom Penh and Calverton, Maryland. National Population and Family Planning Commission (2005). 2004 Government family planning contra- ceptive commodities procurement list. Beijing. Sang Guo-wei et al. (1995a). A multicentred phase III comparative clinical trial of Mesigyna, Cyclofem and injectable No. 1 given by monthly intramus- cular injection to Chinese women. I. Contracep- tive efficacy and side effects. Contraception, 51:167–183. 50 HRP External evaluation 2003–2007 Sang Guo-wei et al. (1995b). A multicentred phase III comparative clinical trial of Mesigyna, Cyclofem and injectable No. 1 given by monthly intra- muscular injection to Chinese women. II. The comparison of bleeding patterns. Contraception, 51:185–192. Sek S et al. (1999). User perceptions of the monthly (Chinese) pill in Cambodia. Paper presented at Second National Socio-Cultural Research Congress on Cambodia. http://rc.racha.org. kh/download.asp?file=/resources/docu- ments/1-100/61-80/67/monthlypill.doc Sun Yibin, Zhu Pengdi (1997). A review of studies of once-a-month oral contraceptives in China. Jour- nal of Reproductive Medicine, 6(Suppl 1):1–10. United Nations Population Division (2003). World contraceptive use. New York, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. WHO (2002). The Strategic Approach to improving reproductive health policies and programmes: a summary of experiences. Geneva, World Health Organization. Improving the safety and effectiveness of contraception in China 51 This case-study was one of ﬁve conducted for the in-depth external evaluation of HRP, 2003–2007. The terms of reference for the overall evaluation, described below, led to the brief terms of reference for this case-study. HRP was established by WHO in 1972 to coordi- nate, promote, conduct and evaluate international research in human reproduction. UNDP, UNFPA and the World Bank joined WHO as cosponsors of HRP in “coordination of the global research effort in the ﬁeld of reproductive health”. As the main instru- ment in the United Nations system for research in human reproduction, HRP brings together health- care providers, policy-makers, scientists, clinicians and consumer and community representatives to identify and address priorities. One recommendation of the 1990–2002 external evaluation was: HRP should continue to focus on global public goods, and should try to document the contribution of its work to global public health. As a measure of efﬁciency, the cost to HRP of its contribution to health out- comes should be calculated. Estimates and projections of abortions averted, unwanted pregnancies prevented, and improved reproductive health through more effective contraceptive methods, emergency contra- ception, and service guidelines will help to demonstrate HRP’s important contributions and cost-efﬁciency. The international task force on global public goods gave the following deﬁnition: International public goods, global and regional, address issues that: (i) are deemed to be important to the international com- munity, to both developed and developing countries; (ii) typically cannot, or will not, be adequately addressed by individual countries or entities acting alone, and, in such cases (iii) are best addressed collectively on a mul- tilateral basis. In the present evaluation, the evaluation team focused on ﬁve Programme achievements that fulﬁl the criteria of global public goods and lend them- selves to an in-depth analysis of inputs, outputs, outcomes and, where possible, impacts on sexual and reproductive health and their contribution to achievement of the Millennium Development Goals, including poverty alleviation. In general, prefer- ence was given to Programme achievements in the recent past (approximately the last decade); how- ever, this time limit made it difﬁcult to demonstrate actual impacts on health outcomes, necessitating the use of proxy indicators and projections based on modelling. Proposed global public goods for in-depth study Case-study 2: Promoting family planning; improving quality of care in family planning in China Since the late 1970s, and with combined WHO and UNFPA support, the Programme has collaborated with the Government of China to build domestic capacity for conducting research on sexual and reproductive health to the highest scientiﬁc and ethical standards. This has allowed Chinese scien- tists and institutions to participate in multinational research and thereby become familiar with ‘west- ern’ contraceptive products and concepts, as well as to critically examine the safety and efﬁcacy of domestic methods in common use. This research addressed, inter alia, Chinese once-a-month inject- able contraceptives, the once-a-month oral pill, visiting pills and domestically produced IUDs. Annex 7. Terms of reference and HRP budget 52 HRP External evaluation 2003–2007 Outputs of Programme-supported work include: withdrawal of locally produced, less effective s� IUDs (stainless-steel ring, copper ring) from the national programme; removal of the once-a-month pill from the s� national procurement list of contraceptive com- modities; comparison of Chinese Injectable No. 1 with s� the Programme’s once-a-month injectables (Mesigyna and Cyclofem); and critical assessment of gossypol for male contra-s� ception. Other considerations: It was subsequently agreed with HRP that gos-s� sypol would not be included in the case-study as it was an older effort and not linked to the ﬁrst three items. It was conﬁrmed that the case-study would not s� cover all HRP contributions to improving quality of care in China but would focus on the above product-related support. The overall terms of reference designated that s� the case-studies would be carried out by ﬁve experts in the respective areas, assisted by a health economist commissioned to support the analyses of public goods. The budget shown in Table 1 was provided by s� HRP for HRP-supported activities and projects covered by the case-study. Improving the safety and effectiveness of contraception in China 53 Table 1. HRP budget for achieving the major outcomes speciﬁed in the terms of reference for this case study Item Amount (US$) Strategic assessment Chongqing Agreement for performance of work with the Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research 33 450 Consultancy Simmons (45 days) 12 150 Travel Ruth Simmons (two trips) 11 000 Mary Broderick (two trips) 7 000 Peter Fajans (three trips) 10 500 Patrick Rowe 3 500 Wu Shangchun 934 Mary Broderick to Ann Arbor 3 500 Fang Kejuan to Ann Arbor 4 500 Subtotal Chongqing assessment 86 534 Plus 8 weeks of P3 HRP staff time and 5 weeks of P5 HRP staff time in 2000–2001 Systematic reviews Agreement for performance of work with the Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research 41 230 Agreement for performance of work with Olav Meirik 8 750 Consultancy Olav Meirik 10 800 Expert working group, travel Patrick Rowe 3 500 Kate Curtis 4 500 Olav Meirik 7 260 Mary Broderick 3 500 Peters Fajans January 2004 4 760 Olav Meirik January 2004 7 260 Peter Fajans April 2004 4 760 Olav Meirik April 2004 7 260 Subtotal systematic reviews 103 580 Plus 2 weeks P3 staff time and 4 weeks P5 staff time Grand total (not including staff time) 190 114
Looking for other reproductive health publications?
The Supplies Information Database (SID) is an online reference library with more than 2000 records on the status of reproductive health supplies. The library includes studies, assessments and other publications dating back to 1986, many of which are no longer available even in their country of origin. Explore the database here.